Science is observation based. The only valid conclusions are based on data. In science, an oppinion is offered to the question, "what do you think".
Faith is based on intangibles. The accurracy of a position of faith cannot be tested objectively. In faith, an oppinion is offered to the question, "what do you believe".
I have grown to a position very similar to DCRamsey. My position is clearly in the minority here and in the world in general. As a society, we do not differentiate what we think from what we believe. Even worse, we consider belief and conclusion as the same thing. And even further, we often cannot or will not differentiate what we think or believe from what we know.
However, I envy AstroVic. I do wish that could figure out a way to tolerate the concept that all oppinions are equal - from faith or from data. I haven't left yet, but I am viewing less topics every day.