I'm generally up to speed on 5w-20. (pun intended) However, I have a Acura TSX loaner with the HP 2.4l (205 hp) and the cap calls for 5w-30. My Accord with the same build 2.4, (170hp) just (possibly) more compression or exhaust v-tech or boosted FI/SI mapping wears great on 5w-20. Now, if 5w-20 is the bee's knees, why can't it cut it in an engine with a few more HP and similar tolerances, bearing metallurgy etc. Is the safe working visc HT/HS threshold so close that a few HP could make the difference...and do you think mfgs are dialing-in LESS power to allow 5w-20 and fuel benefits?
Another thing is that we won't be seeing a back-spec to 5w-20 either, as their testing has apparently concluded. I think 5w-20 is perfect, where speced, but I do find it interesting that a bit more specific output pushed it over the edge. This should tell people who chip and tune their cars to "mod" their oil too. Funny too, the torque values on some of these 5w-20/30 engine variants is similar or identical, like my RSX vs RSX-S.
Another thing is that we won't be seeing a back-spec to 5w-20 either, as their testing has apparently concluded. I think 5w-20 is perfect, where speced, but I do find it interesting that a bit more specific output pushed it over the edge. This should tell people who chip and tune their cars to "mod" their oil too. Funny too, the torque values on some of these 5w-20/30 engine variants is similar or identical, like my RSX vs RSX-S.