Originally Posted By: rjacket
Originally Posted By: Klutch9
I think the closest you'll get to this is the UOA section. The problem is, 99.9999% of us have neither the time, resources, ability, or equipment to test and achieve hard data of any sort for any length of time. That's why we get UOAs done, which is the closest we can get. UOAs aren't completely accurate or truth-telling either, but they do give you a good idea, and show trends when users do multiple UOAs in a row with similar commutes. Controlling the variables (the most important part of any test), unless one has a test bench/dyno, is nearly impossible. Even a slight change in one's commute could drastically change one's aspect of a UOA which, again, is the most truth-telling test(s) that 99.9999% of us can do.
Don't get me wrong, I like your idea. It's just not feasible
I'm not sure what part of my idea is not feasible. I'm just interested in hearing interesting stories of when an oil made some sort of substantial difference. I don't mean in the sense of M1 caused half the wear vs PU or vice versa. I mean in the sense that my mpg shot up (or down), a big noise disappeared, my acceleration improved.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with what you say about not having the time to achieve hard data conclusions. Which is exactly my point, we're all interested in finding out what's better, but we don't really have a way to do that. We have some facts, different levels of understanding amongst folks, and as a result a lot of incomplete opinions.
Therefore, I'm interested in single data points that show that in a particular set of circumstances, one product did something amazing compared to another.
I agree with you, and enjoy testimony and success or failure stories. A lot of times I see using the UOA section like using a crystal ball. People take the numbers they see and use them to attempt to praise or condemn a product. Sometimes its almost like a sporting event with fans from both teams trying to make a case on why their team lost for example. Then the numbers are challenged and cases built for and against them. EG: High iron might not be from wear, high copper can be from "a chemistry thing". And if your favorite oil bombs, the UOA report was meaningless.
In fact here's an interesting UOA discussion, pick a side.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2446120&page=1
Casting doubt is one of the easiest things you can do to so called facts and data related to oil.