I'm guessing you are not the type to just bid long-call, but I assume you are also at a point in seniority where you could minimize your work days if you wanted to. Your participation in the training side of course is a choice that most don't make either.
That’s the part that is killing me on schedule - working 18 days every other month in Denver and commuting to/from. The commute adds a day to each work “block” and in June, the schedule was atrocious - I was assigned 18 days, but with several single days off in the middle of my work blocks, so, I ended up spending 25 straight days in Denver. Couldn’t get home.
It adds up. I find the Training Center work very rewarding, and the pay is generous, but the schedule is crushing.
The challenge for me, with long call, is that I don’t like the stress of commuting to EWR on short notice. I did that for years. With the operational challenges at EWR, there is a chance I would not make it, and that is not the kind of life I want to lead. Better for me to fly up the night before, on a ticket I bought, so there are no surprises, stay at a hotel, and fly out the next day, well rested, after a nice workout and a good breakfast.
S, I don’t bid long call - on my airplane (757/767) I bid at about 35%, so I generally get what I want - and in July, it’s 5 international trips, 3 LHR, one KEF, one BRU, and they’re in big blocks - back to back, to minimize the commuting events, but, even though I got exactly what I want, I will spend (with travel days) about 18 at work, and about 12 days at home.
And that’s really my point - some guys are able, and choose, to fly domestic one day trips, and they live near the airport, so they can drive in and be home at night. I have not had that option since 2002. When I am at work, I am at work, and spending the nights in a hotel, until I get home.
So, sure, my “79 hour” schedule in July sounds like I am not working much, but I am getting only 12 days at home in order to fly those hours. I could have picked up an overtime 3 day trip to BRU over the 4th, and made an extra 22 hours, but after 25 straight days out here, I wasn’t interested.
You fly 100 hours as a pilot, you’re not home much. 777/787 trips from EWR to places like NRT (Narita, Tokyo) get you a lot of hours, and more days off, but that’s not the kind of flying I enjoy and it’s really hard on your body.
The real problem, when the public sees “100 hours” they think the job is structured like their job - drive to work, work 8 hours, spend the nights at home, getting paid for each hour you’re on the job. Maybe stay late or work a Saturday or two for OT at time and a half.
And the reality is absolutely nothing like that. Sure, my pay in July is based on 79 hours, but it will take me 18 days of work to get those hours, and each of those days is a night away from home. I spend far more than 3500 hours “on the job” in order to get paid 900 over the course of a year.
And it took me 3 decades to get to this point on the pay scale. 3 decades.
And in my case, that included two combat deployments, over a decade of making less than $60,000/year (working those same 3500 hours, roughly) because of airline economic problems/bankruptcy.
Looking at “100 hours” is like looking at a surgeon, and thinking, “Man, they only operate for a couple hours a day, five days a week and make over half a million” while conveniently ignoring that surgeons take call, spending over 24 hours in the hospital when trauma cases come in, they do rounds at 6 AM to check up on patients, they hold office visits and everything else that adds up to 80+ hour weeks, but yeah, they only spend a couple hours of the day “getting paid”.
That’s exactly how the airlines are - I get paid for one aspect of the job, when the airplane is off the gate, not for all the time I put in before, after, or away from home.