I read thru it and all I saw was a dozen different opinions on battery charging - nothing I see as actual fact. I can see the points of why keep charging at 50% which doubles charging times which is bad for the battery. I think I will continue to subscribe to the thoughts of charge the battery to 100% and let it run down to 15-20% and charge back to 100. Keeping a battery at 30-50% is wasteful and not good if something happens to you and you run out of charge. I would imagine the battery could loose capacity as well over time only 1/2 charging. I think storing a laptop at 100% is the better option.
As with many things in life, including the topics discussed here, there is a gap between theoretical best practices, and pragmatic practical needs, that is reconciled as part of a personal choice.
Those with hobbies that involve the use of bare lithium cells, with no management systems or protective measures beyond what the user manually undertakes themselves, will agree that cells with such chemistries can benefit from avoiding the extremes in the SoC (80/20 rule), not charging them at a rate any higher than necessary, and maintaining their overall health by adhering to the "good," or "smart" practices.
The artificial, conservative upper charge limits aren't programmed into the BMS' software for no purpose, in either EVs, or your portable devices, but to enhance (though not guarantee) durability, and the lower charge limits (0% isn't really 'dead') are there for safety, to prevent real damage that increases the risk of unpleasant consequences. There is real science behind those practices, even if they are mostly passed around by word of mouth, passive acceptance, and the occasional research paper.
Like here, there are also those who take those practices to OCD-level heights, but in real life sacrifice a lot of practical utility for not much real benefit, except perhaps peace of mind.
Most people would not be willing to sacrifice 40% of a battery's capacity in the hopes that their device, or whatever, might last a little longer; they want to use their device to its full practical potential, don't care to know about the science, and will suffer no penalities because those devices will be replaced on a regular schedule anyway, and the rate of the battery's life consumption, even if higher than the expected norm, is irrelevant.
I keep the cells in my flashlights at full 100% charge for readiness, and maximum duty when called upon. But even if they do suffer premature deaths, it will be of little concern, because I can replace them for a few dollars each. But I would not treat my laptop, if I owned one, in the same fashion. Use cases are also part of the consideration.
In short, it's valid advice to heed, but at what practical sacrifice, and what actual benefit is hard to determine, and prove. OTOH, if such steps are easy to practice, like in the OP's use case, it wouldn't be a bad idea either. But there are no guarantees.
Doctors say a healthy diet and exercise will help one live longer. But people die young anyway, and those who subsist on poor diets and don't exercise do lead long lives as well. Live it as you please.