High viscosity oil

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
25
Location
ca
His all just a quick question about using a thicker oil in a vehicle that doesn't "require" it. For example if a car or truck calls for a 5w-20 and you put 15w-40 in it, will that cause wear on the oil pump trying to pump that oil instead of a 5 20? Not just the oil pump but are there other parts that are or could be strained?
 
If you are in a place and climate where it is warm (such as Palm Springs in the summer) you can get away with it easier. I sometimes buy the heavy oils if they are on sale.
 
I would make sure that if you are in a colder climate that its use was during the warmer months of the year. Then go back to factory recommended oil during winter months.
 
Your question will most likely receive a lot of "opinions". There are very good reasons the engineers of your vehicle recommend a certain viscosity oil. If you haven't read the Motor Oil University BITOG Motor Oil University please click onto the link and do so. The author has a very good explanation of this very subject. I have wrenched on more different types of engines (including jet) than I care to remember, and have always found that it's best to stay with the manufacturer's recommendations and not try to "second guess" them. Unless the engine is very worn, stick to the correct viscosity for maximum engine longivity. I've ran a lot of them past 200,000 by doing just that, and not a single one has ever failed me......
 
Unless the oil was "chosen" for reasons other than providing maximum engine life, banking on the original owner not feeling slighted by an engine that they onsold, had the car rust out, or wrecked in the vast majority of applications. BTW, the link has a lot of inaccuracies.
 
Quote:
BTW, the link has a lot of inaccuracies.
Yeah, there were some things I didn't quite agree with either, but I felt they did a reasonably good job explaining oil viscosity. I do know that bearing clearances today are extraordinarily tight compared to the engines of "years gone by" and do require a "thinner" viscosity to provide the flow necessary for proper cushion and cooling. Believe me, 0W-20 is a hard sell for me too. Old habits ya know....
 
I would caution against making such a wide grade shift. Going from 5w-20 to 5w-30 isn't bad. But a 40 grade might have implications past what you will see initially. Much of it depends upon what the vehicle was designed to run on. Modern engines designed in the last several years are spec'd for 20 grade. A much thicker oil may not flow well into all the necessary places, or perform as needed in hydraulic plungers like cam phasers and chain tensioners, etc. Just stick with what the OEM specs; best advice. You're not going to "out think" the OEM engineering and reliability testing.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
I would caution against making such a wide grade shift. Going from 5w-20 to 5w-30 isn't bad. But a 40 grade might have implications past what you will see initially. Much of it depends upon what the vehicle was designed to run on. Modern engines designed in the last several years are spec'd for 20 grade. A much thicker oil may not flow well into all the necessary places, or perform as needed in hydraulic plungers like cam phasers and chain tensioners, etc. Just stick with what the OEM specs; best advice. You're not going to "out think" the OEM engineering and reliability testing.
approved We have a winner! Rather than protecting better, a thick oil may actually result in more wear than a thin one. Several studies have shown that lower viscosity oils actually perform better as measured by bearing and ring wear.
 
Originally Posted By: jetmech1
I do know that bearing clearances today are extraordinarily tight compared to the engines of "years gone by" and do require a "thinner" viscosity to provide the flow necessary for proper cushion and cooling.
Another inaccuracy.
 
As the old addage goes: As thin as possible; as thick as necessary. Thin equals better flow at start up, good compatibility with cam phasers, chain tensioners, etc. Thick equals better cushion in bearing journals, COB interface, etc. Therefore, lubricants (like most every single thing in life) is a compromise. Again, are you in a postion to out-think the engineering team, and the hundreds of hours of reliability testing, etc? A small grade shift likely will not result in any discernable difference. But a big grade shift will have some implications (pro and con) down the road.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Originally Posted By: jetmech1
I do know that bearing clearances today are extraordinarily tight compared to the engines of "years gone by" and do require a "thinner" viscosity to provide the flow necessary for proper cushion and cooling.
Another inaccuracy.
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Originally Posted By: jetmech1
I do know that bearing clearances today are extraordinarily tight compared to the engines of "years gone by" and do require a "thinner" viscosity to provide the flow necessary for proper cushion and cooling.
Another inaccuracy.
Perhaps. However, what isn't inaccurate is that straight weights and multigrade 40 and 50 weight oils were speced back when when fuel dilution was monstrous (carb days) and the oil products were nowhere near as good, with multigrades shearing severely. Would you take a 1940s to early 1960s vintage gas truck with original carb in good running condition, run it with the high lead gas of the day (if you could), load it up with the 10w-40 of the vintage, and run it for an OCI of over 5,000 miles? If you did, it would be interesting to see a UOA. Today, there are very few engines out there that can't run well over 5,000 miles on conventional 5w-20 or 5w-30 (or whatever is specified). Engines today may not require thinner oils "to provide the flow necessary for proper cushion and cooling" due to "extraordinarily tight" bearing clearances. However, engines today certainly do not have to deal with carbs, leaded gasoline, and API SE oils, either.
 
That's a lot of cool accurate info, but doesn't really have anything to do with the implications of running a 15W40 in a late model in lieu of 5W20 and whether or not the bearings were "designed" for it. Just to comment on your info though, my 1959 Willys was spec'd for 20W oil as well.
 
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
That's a lot of cool accurate info, but doesn't really have anything to do with the implications of running a 15W40 in a late model in lieu of 5W20 and whether or not the bearings were "designed" for it.
I'd agree that running a 15w-40 or something similar (at least in reasonable weather conditions) in an "average" 5w-20 vehicle won't make much difference, and certainly wouldn't be harmful. That's especially true for those that were originally speced for thicker oils and simply back speced to 5w-20. My point was that the notion that engines are "designed" for thinner oils today might be a little overblown, but there were several reasons for thicker oils in the old days, too.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top