High maintenance costs and lack of fuel strands hydrogen busses

OVERKILL

$100 Site Donor 2021
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
60,919
Location
Ontario, Canada
https://inews.co.uk/news/millions-s...-lack-fuel-3694074?ito=link_share_article-top

Councils have spent millions on hydrogen buses so plagued with faults that many vehicles have been left trapped in depots for months at a time. Liverpool, Birmingham and Aberdeen Councils are among those that have faced challenges with their hydrogen bus fleets, including high maintenance costs and a lack of fuel supply.

At least 139 hydrogen buses have been purchased by local authorities for around £500,000 each, as part of trials of the new technology in recent years. However, experts told The i Paper problems faced by councils which have forced dozens of vehicles off the road, have been “utterly predictable” and urged authorities to focus on electric buses instead.

Some suggested hydrogen trials had taken place due to industry lobbying, with several councils having received funding from the oil and gas industry to help fund hydrogen buses.

David Cebon, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Cambridge, claimed the trials, which are often supported by taxpayers, are “way too expensive” and “the hydrogen supply is not there”. He said: “I’ve got a list of 27 failed hydrogen bus projects around the world and it’s just the same story again and again.”



Interesting data point from the article:

Hydrogen bus trials have been taking place in the UK for 20 years. In 2005, Transport for London (TfL) took part in a scheme alongside nine other European cities with funding from a group including oil-giant BP.

Since then cities across the UK and the world have experimented with hydrogen for their bus networks, but many of these trials have hit the same stumbling blocks, including high costs and a lack of reliable hydrogen supply.

The most recent UK trials have taken place in Liverpool, Birmingham, Crawley, Aberdeen and London. Dozens of buses involved have been off the road since last summer, including 25 in Aberdeen and 20 in Liverpool.



I had no idea that they'd been at it this long!!!

139 busses @ 500,000 pounds each is $69.5 million pounds. That's a pretty considerable investment.

As I've noted in other threads, government putting money into hydrogen has been a common theme, it's an industry borne by subsidy and when those subsidies are tempered or removed, collapse follows. As noted above, it's often fossil fuel companies pushing for these investments, with Shell as an example in California, but there have been ups and downs there as well, such as the complete removal of all of Shell's filling stations in California, pretty much killing the ability to fuel FCEV's.

As @alarmguy noted in another thread, forklifts have been a popular point of investment by major companies with hydrogen. It will be quite interesting to watch if this is a space it actually succeeds in. Batteries, so far, have been winning in everything from cars to grid storage.
 
Last edited:
As noted above, it's often fossil fuel companies pushing for these investments, with Shell as an example in California, but there have been ups and downs there as well, such as the complete removal of all of Shell's filling stations in California, pretty much killing the ability to fuel FCEV's.
There were (at least) 2 hydrogen filling stations near me; one was at a Chevron and the other a cheapie... I was kinda excited when the Mirai was announced; then I saw one. No thanks. I'm pretty sure many of the filling stations are gone and I rarely see a Mirai. I talked to one owner where I worked; he hated the thing.

I bought our 1st Model 3 soon after and couldn't be happier as it turned out to be a good fit for us.
 
There were (at least) 2 hydrogen filling stations near me; one was at a Chevron and the other a cheapie... I was kinda excited when the Mirai was announced; then I saw one. No thanks. I'm pretty sure many of the filling stations are gone and I rarely see a Mirai. I talked to one owner where I worked; he hated the thing.

I bought our 1st Model 3 soon after and couldn't be happier as it turned out to be a good fit for us.
Looks like the closest one to you is in Campbell - Winchester. The 35mPA filler is offline, as is also the case at the Saratoga one. These all appear to be operated by "FirstElement" fuel.
 
$69.5 million pounds.. Talk about buyers remorse (or tax payers remorse).
Let’s not forget that US taxpayers have directly paid two billion dollars to individuals and companies who bought electric vehicles in the USA.

Those are direct payments and do not include all the government incentives directly to corporations developing electric vehicle technology.

69,000,000 pounds is chump change and not even close to what the US taxpayer contributed to electric vehicle promotion indirect payments to the end user.
Electric vehicle sales are a failure in the United States.
The only way to prove they are not is to stop taxpayer funded direct payments to those who purchase them. It’s the most insane program in the history of this country, giving people free and clear $7500 to go out and buy an expensive car loaded with luxuries.

Two billion dollars given away does not include billions more in direct incentives to corporations
How can anybody call electric vehicles successful is beyond me.
Stop giving purchasers of vechicles $7500 to buy an electric vehicle or $4000 for a used one and then we all can have a discussion.

By the way, even though I replied to you, I am just generally discussing things. Please don’t take my post the wrong way.
 
Last edited:
Let’s not forget that US taxpayers have directly paid two billion dollars to individuals and companies who bought electric vehicles in the USA.

Those are direct payments and do not include all the government incentives directly to corporations developing electric vehicle technology.

69,000,000 pounds is chump change and not even close to what the US taxpayer contributed to electric vehicle promotion indirect payments to the end user.
Electric vehicle sales are a failure in the United States.
The only way to prove they are not is to stop taxpayer funded direct payments to those who purchase them. It’s the most insane program in the history of this country, giving people free and clear $7500 to go out and buy an expensive car loaded with luxuries.
Cash for clunkers cost $3 billion in 2009 so $2 billion to get the electric car ball rolling isn't that bad imo.
 
Cash for clunkers cost $3 billion in 2009 so $2 billion to get the electric car ball rolling isn't that bad imo.
if you don’t think it’s bad that is certainly you’re right to feel that way.
It does show what a flop electric vehicle sales are, sales of electric vehicles are solely artificially propped up by the taxpaying public and the only reason many of them are sold
 
Last edited:
Almost every Sunday especially on holiday weekends here are posts of Facebook for people looking to fuel their NG car they drove to Vegas and need to fuel to get home.

There are no/ zero places here to fuel a NG private car . Infact the closest is over 50 miles away.they all end up being towed home.
 
if you don’t think it’s bad that is certainly you’re right to feel that way.
It does show what a flop electric vehicle sales are, sales of electric vehicles are solely artificially propped up by the taxpaying public and the only reason many of them are sold
So the trillions given to the manufacturers of fossil fuel cars was a wise choice? Electric cars are the future once we run out of the easy and cheap oil supplies. Most of the US manufacturers would be out of business if they didn't have taxpayers bailing and propping them up.
 
if you don’t think it’s bad that is certainly you’re right to feel that way.
It does show what a flop electric vehicle sales are, sales of electric vehicles are solely artificially propped up by the taxpaying public and the only reason many of them are sold
The reality is the taxpayer likely funded my massive return and many others on Tesla stock I dumped late last year. No complaints here.
 
So the trillions given to the manufacturers of fossil fuel cars was a wise choice? Electric cars are the future once we run out of the easy and cheap oil supplies. Most of the US manufacturers would be out of business if they didn't have taxpayers bailing and propping them up.
It’s cheaper to manufacture synthetic fuels like Germany did in the ‘40s than it is to mine, obtain and refine the rare earth materials to make the batteries. The problem is, you don’t need to ravage third-world countries’ landscapes and labor supplies to make synthetic fuels.

Plus, you don’t clog up the grid with periodic power sources like wind & solar; I’m no longer in power generation but somebody like @OVERKILL or @MVAR could probably comment on the second link below: current power generation (both hydrocarbon and nuclear) could easily supply the energy requirements to create syncrude/syngas, and, if this works like it appears they say, the only form of carbon sequestration that I’d ever think was viable on its face (just speeding up the circle of carbon lifecycle). Batteries are, for many reasons, not the preferred option for mobile applications, and carry serious risk when sized for grid-size supply.

Future generations of humans may well need to find alternative sources of energy storage, but in the meantime there’s no need to rush immature technologies with poor efficiencies nor serious, as-yet-unmanageable consequences when that technology fails. F-T and syngas have been in use for a hundred years and is very reliable and very safe. The infrastructure to deal with the outputs of syngas plants is already well-established, and does not require making government bets on unproven technologies. Let’s use hydrocarbon fuels and their derivatives in the meantime, while other stuff is developed.

https://www.historiascripta.org/mod...c-fuel-effort-origins-development-and-legacy/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236124030515
 
Toyota messed around with Hydrogen in their Mirai series. It was a big flop. Nowhere to buy fuel, except around the southern California area. And the fuel got insanely expensive when the subsidies ran out.

I've never understood the fascination with Hydrogen. It takes more energy to make it than it produces. Great for a 8-1/2 minute ride on the Space Shuttle. Lousy for automobiles.

It looks like it was put together by a alcoholic plumber.

1747688686209.webp
 
Last edited:
So the trillions given to the manufacturers of fossil fuel cars was a wise choice? Electric cars are the future once we run out of the easy and cheap oil supplies. Most of the US manufacturers would be out of business if they didn't have taxpayers bailing and propping them up.
What difference does it make for the statement?
I simply stated without giving $7500 to individuals to purchase electric vehicles, sales would be in the toilet.
Are you denying that?
 
What difference does it make for the statement?
I simply stated without giving $7500 to individuals to purchase electric vehicles, sales would be in the toilet.
Are you denying that?
I think there would still be an EV market if we had no subsidies, I think everything would be evolving at a much slower pace however. When GM introduced the EV1, the people that owned them loved them, just like most Model S owners when Tesla first appeared on the scene.
 
I think there would still be an EV market if we had no subsidies, I think everything would be evolving at a much slower pace however. When GM introduced the EV1, the people that owned them loved them, just like most Model S owners when Tesla first appeared on the scene.
I agree there will be a market. It just won’t be as it is now and actually I think I’m quite sure that costs would come down meaning there might be less frills and options in the cars for the general public. I’m not talking about some of the income levels in this forum though. But we see time again, the electric vehicles coming out loaded with options that the median income in the US family cannot buy. If I’m making any sense.🙂

I guess the only thing that really bothers me is, we don’t know what the market is unless they get rid of these incentives. I actually thought we would by now, but with that Tesla guy in Washington my hopes faded really quick.
 
I have a problem with the whole "electric cars are the future", mantra. LED illumination is the future. 65" flat screen TV's are the future. Cell phones are the future.

Because people want them, and they keep getting better and cheaper. And they are far better than what they replaced. EV's don't have enough of a sales base to be anything but a niche market. They simply don't work for too many people.
 
Back
Top Bottom