Hello all. First time poster and first UOA
Blackstone Lab did the analysis. Oil is Havoline 5w-30 SM Synthetic.
Vehicle is a 2006 Toyota Tacoma 4 cyl (2TR-FE).
I previously ran two OCIs of Havoline Dino before switching to Havoline full syn. I also had a VOA done on this same SM syn which confirmed the high level of moly. They must have changed the formula from the SL version, which apparantly had very little moly. Left numbers are my results, right numbers are universal averages.
Miles on unit 9977
Miles on oil 4065
Aluminum 3/2
Chromium 1/0
Iron 4/6
Copper 8/4
Lead 0/1
Tin 0/0
Moly 430/41
Nickel 0/0
Maganese 0/0
Silver 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Potassium 0/0
Boron 37/34
Silicon 16/13
Sodium 2/14
Calcium 1885/2071
Magnesium 9/55
Phosphorus 667/729
Zinc 831/878
Barium 0/0
TBN 3.2
SUS Visc @ 210 F 54.8
Flashpoint in F 380.0
Fuel % < .5
Antifreeze % 0.0
Water % 0.0
Insolubles % .1
Blackstone thought the copper and silicon were a little high but probably were leftover from wear in. Should improve on the next report. They also mentioned the viscosity was a little light. Overall they thought it was a good report with no problems. I'm running another OCI of this oil currently. Any comments? Thanks
Blackstone Lab did the analysis. Oil is Havoline 5w-30 SM Synthetic.
Vehicle is a 2006 Toyota Tacoma 4 cyl (2TR-FE).
I previously ran two OCIs of Havoline Dino before switching to Havoline full syn. I also had a VOA done on this same SM syn which confirmed the high level of moly. They must have changed the formula from the SL version, which apparantly had very little moly. Left numbers are my results, right numbers are universal averages.
Miles on unit 9977
Miles on oil 4065
Aluminum 3/2
Chromium 1/0
Iron 4/6
Copper 8/4
Lead 0/1
Tin 0/0
Moly 430/41
Nickel 0/0
Maganese 0/0
Silver 0/0
Titanium 0/0
Potassium 0/0
Boron 37/34
Silicon 16/13
Sodium 2/14
Calcium 1885/2071
Magnesium 9/55
Phosphorus 667/729
Zinc 831/878
Barium 0/0
TBN 3.2
SUS Visc @ 210 F 54.8
Flashpoint in F 380.0
Fuel % < .5
Antifreeze % 0.0
Water % 0.0
Insolubles % .1
Blackstone thought the copper and silicon were a little high but probably were leftover from wear in. Should improve on the next report. They also mentioned the viscosity was a little light. Overall they thought it was a good report with no problems. I'm running another OCI of this oil currently. Any comments? Thanks