German and Porsche are sore loosers !

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Porsche apparently does care. They would not otherwise be trash-talking Tesla.
Tesla may have only sold a bit more than 20% of the vehicles that Porsche did last year, but every Tesla sold was a high priced vehicle with no dealer margins involved.
Neither can be said for Porsche.


Average sales price for Porsche (revenue/#of car sold) was around $107k. How about for Tesla?
Tesla is loosing 15 grand per can, but that's OK because the taxpayer funded grants keep coming.

Not sure what you're saying here.
It should be obvious to anyone that the average selling price of Porsche badged vehicles isn't anything close to $107K.
Maybe you mean that if you divide the imaginary list prices by the number of models you'd come to 107K?
Otherwise, your post makes no sense at all.
 
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Can you clarify on the claim that Porsche is copying Tesla? Producing a car to compete in the same segment isn't copying, so I'm curious as to what constitutes that claim here.

Porsche(and all German engineers) couldn't design/engineer a battery power vehicle that could go 100 miles or more on a single charge.

Tesla pioneered the EV with a range of 200 miles between charge, German engineers and Porsche engineers particular did nothing other than copy Tesla vehicles(Roaster, model S and X) design to make their own.

BMW engineers did few battery power cars some years ago, with lead acid batteries (probably bought on sale from Walmart), that was all German engineers could think off. Batteries ? Walmart's clearance shelf is the best source.

As I said, copying is okay if you are not capable of thinking for yourself, but keep your mouth shut if you are copying someone else design.

If you think German engineers(and/or Porsche engineers) pioneered EV as we know it now, please post your reference.

I am truly tired of "German Engineered", all they are good for is cheating and copying.

BMW first electric car, with lead acid batteries bought on clearance shelf at Walmart

1972-bmw-1602e_100505145_l.jpg
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Originally Posted By: UltrafanUK
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Porsche apparently does care. They would not otherwise be trash-talking Tesla.
Tesla may have only sold a bit more than 20% of the vehicles that Porsche did last year, but every Tesla sold was a high priced vehicle with no dealer margins involved.
Neither can be said for Porsche.


Anything goes in marketing tactics when you move into a newish sector. The Germans are a bit too far ahead in technical and legal terms to be interested in copying.



The Germans are well behind Tesla in this technical arena just as they are behind the Japanese and even Ford and GM in most others.
German vehicle reliability and durability has been below par for the past twenty years.
The German makers live more upon their heritage as well as the performance their lease customers enjoy for a few short years.
Own an old high-po Benz, BMW or even VAG product and you'll understand.


Maybe...

But then, I've seen a hybrid Porsche, and hybrid as we now know it, in the Porsche museum in Stuttgart.

It was built about 1900.

So, I would say that Toyota was only 90 years behind Porsche in bringing a hybrid to market.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lohner-Porsche
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
I'm not sure why Porsche should really care about Tesla. It's like complaining about a spec of dust. Porsche had ~225,000 sales in 2015. Tesla had ~50,000. Tesla is peanuts compared to Porsche and Porsche is a niche market peanut player in the total car sales. To compare Ford sells 10x as many as Porsche.

Bickering over minor market players is pitiful.

The reason was they are copying Tesla idea and design to make their own EV. They are established manufacture with hundreds engineers in R&D dept but couldn't think of design/engineer a good EV with 200+ miles range, now they have to copying a new comer idea/design.

Ferrari didn't say a word about Tesla, they just ignore minor player.

Why a new company without any experience in car design/engineer/manufacture can come up with an EV that is dominating market(even at very high price), and all the wonderful German Engineers couldn't ?
 
Originally Posted By: UltrafanUK
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Porsche apparently does care. They would not otherwise be trash-talking Tesla.
Tesla may have only sold a bit more than 20% of the vehicles that Porsche did last year, but every Tesla sold was a high priced vehicle with no dealer margins involved.
Neither can be said for Porsche.

Anything goes in marketing tactics when you move into a newish sector. The Germans are a bit too far ahead in technical and legal terms to be interested in copying.

When did German auto manufactures had an EV with 200+ miles range ?

What is the best German engineers can do now ? 110-120 miles ? What is the shortest distance a Tesla model S can go between charges ? 50 miles or 250 miles ?

When was the first time a German EV use Li-on batteries ? when was the first time Li-on batteries used in a Tesla vehicle ? Who copies who ?
 
Meanwhile friggan' GM is knocking Ford for their aluminum bodies.. even though:

a. They are looking into the same thing.
b. They've used aluminum for years.

Post bailout GM knows they suck and they are desperately trying to kindle something from their disaster.

Such shame from an "American" company. I wonder if GM and Purolator will go on a joint venture.
 
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
I'm not sure why Porsche should really care about Tesla. It's like complaining about a spec of dust. Porsche had ~225,000 sales in 2015. Tesla had ~50,000. Tesla is peanuts compared to Porsche and Porsche is a niche market peanut player in the total car sales. To compare Ford sells 10x as many as Porsche.

Bickering over minor market players is pitiful.

Why Porsche is copying Tesla idea/design ? If Tesla didn't successful with their vehicles Porsche would not copying Tesla designs to make their own Mission-E that will be available by 2020.

Did Porsche invented/marketed an EV with Li-on battery and 200+ miles range before Tesla ?

Who is copying whom ?
 
Maybe we should create a thread by Tesla copied all the other EV's on the market before them? Come on. Copy Tesla design? That's a joke. It's a competitive marketplace but no one is copying Tesla's idea as if they came up with something original.
 
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
I'm not sure why Porsche should really care about Tesla. It's like complaining about a spec of dust. Porsche had ~225,000 sales in 2015. Tesla had ~50,000. Tesla is peanuts compared to Porsche and Porsche is a niche market peanut player in the total car sales. To compare Ford sells 10x as many as Porsche.

Bickering over minor market players is pitiful.

The reason was they are copying Tesla idea and design to make their own EV. They are established manufacture with hundreds engineers in R&D dept but couldn't think of design/engineer a good EV with 200+ miles range, now they have to copying a new comer idea/design.

Ferrari didn't say a word about Tesla, they just ignore minor player.

Why a new company without any experience in car design/engineer/manufacture can come up with an EV that is dominating market(even at very high price), and all the wonderful German Engineers couldn't ?


Because it's a money loser and the other automakers have been very reluctant to get into a market that they would lose money per car sold and only propped up by govt subsidies to the consumer. But all the automakers have been looking at EV and hybrids for a long time.

Tesla isn't the first unless you narrow down the description. Anybody can be the first for anything if you narrow it enough.
 
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR

Porsche(and all German engineers) couldn't design/engineer a battery power vehicle that could go 100 miles or more on a single charge.

Tesla pioneered the EV with a range of 200 miles between charge, German engineers and Porsche engineers particular did nothing other than copy Tesla vehicles(Roaster, model S and X) design to make their own.

BMW engineers did few battery power cars some years ago, with lead acid batteries (probably bought on sale from Walmart), that was all German engineers could think off. Batteries ? Walmart's clearance shelf is the best source.

As I said, copying is okay if you are not capable of thinking for yourself, but keep your mouth shut if you are copying someone else design.

If you think German engineers(and/or Porsche engineers) pioneered EV as we know it now, please post your reference.

I am truly tired of "German Engineered", all they are good for is cheating and copying.



That sounds like a lot of hyperbole and opinion and not a lot of fact. Germany has always been on the forefront of science and engineering (see WWII for example) and it is that approach that has led to less than stellar reliability at times with the consumer doing the "beta testing" so to speak.

Tesla IMPROVED the EV (and that's all they make) by using Lithium Ion batteries (which is most certainly not a technology they invented) which aided in providing the improved range. That's not a difficult concept to grasp.

Are you familiar with GM's EV1? If not, I suggest reading up on it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1

It was the first mass-produced electric vehicle of the modern period and the 2nd generation had a range of around 100-140 miles, which, when considering it used a NIMH battery, was pretty bloody good.

Also, Mercedes was manufacturing electric busses as far back as the 1960's:

Originally Posted By: Wikipedia

Nonetheless, Mercedes-Benz engaged in intensive research and development of alternative propulsion systems in the 1960s. In 1969 the brand presented the OE302 electric bus. Two years later, a natural-gas-fuelled version of the O305 was unveiled, and in 1975 the OE302 duo bus went into trial operation in Esslingen, Germany. A minibus operated on pure hydrogen was demonstrated in 1977. In 1978 the hybrid electric OE305 was presented. The same year Mercedes-Benz do Brasil presented the OF-1315 front engine natural-gas-fuelled bus chassis for the Brazilian market. Other five duo buses went into trial operation in Esslingen the following year, two of them in battery/trolley operation and the other three in diesel/trolley operation. Also in 1979, Daimler-Benz sent a German-built O305 trolleybus to be tested on the São Paulo trolleybus system, Brazil, then one of the most extensive trolleybus systems in the western world. The O305 GT trolleybus would go into production in 1981. Also in 1981 a methanol-fuelled O305 was unveiled.

In 1983 methanol-drive Mercedes-Benz buses were tested in São Paulo, Brazil. Some time later, 40 natural-gas-fuelled Mercedes-Benz O364 rear-engine integral buses went into experimental operation in that city. Two of them used a mixture of soy oil, ethanol and B-Diesel as fuel. In the following year Mercedes-Benz do Brasil unveil the OH-1315, a natural-gas-fuelled rear-engine bus chassis, and the O371 integral bus range for the Brazilian market, including a natural-gas integral urban bus and a trolleybus. In 1986 experiments were made in Europe with an articulated duo bus (diesel/electric) based on the O405. The O405 trolleybus was presented in that same year.

In 1984, a trial was carried out with a four O305 buses already in use in Auckland, New Zealand, with two powered by liquid petroleum gas and two powered by compressed natural gas (CNG). At the same time, two Volvo B10M buses were converted to run on methanol. All six, as well as a further 50 O303 and O305 buses, were all put onto CNG. Auckland City had a fleet of one hundred O303 buses and three hundred O305 buses.

In the 1990s three new natural-gas-powered models were unveiled by Mercedes-Benz: the O405 GN GNG low-floor articulated bus, which was Europe's first natural gas low-floor city bus; the O405 NG solo city bus and the O405 ÜNG for rural service. All models were fitted with the M-447 hG engine that was exported from Brazil.

In 1994 a prototype of a low-floor articulated duo bus based on the O405 - the O405 GNTD - was presented, featuring electric hub motors.

In 1996 the OH-1315 natural-gas bus chassis is succeeded by the OH-1621 LG, also natural-gas-powered. One year later, the OH-1621 LG was equipped with an electronic-managed engine as standard.

In 1997 Daimler-Benz presented its first fuel-cell bus, designated NEBUS (New Electric Bus), based on the O405 urban bus. It was the world's first fully operational fuel-cell-powered bus. Another fuel-cell-powered was developed later, based on the Citaro. Exemplars of the Citaro Fuel Cell bus are currently being tested in Europe, China and Australia.
 
English-speaking Kremlin bots make more than Uber drivers at the moment. You could leverage your talents there
 
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Originally Posted By: Nate1979
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Porsche apparently does care. They would not otherwise be trash-talking Tesla.
Tesla may have only sold a bit more than 20% of the vehicles that Porsche did last year, but every Tesla sold was a high priced vehicle with no dealer margins involved.
Neither can be said for Porsche.


Average sales price for Porsche (revenue/#of car sold) was around $107k. How about for Tesla?


Not sure what you're saying here.
It should be obvious to anyone that the average selling price of Porsche badged vehicles isn't anything close to $107K.
Maybe you mean that if you divide the imaginary list prices by the number of models you'd come to 107K?
Otherwise, your post makes no sense at all.


Revenue for Porsche in 2015 was ~$24B. Total cars delivered was 225k.

Average sales price was $107k.

You can find the figures here:
https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/annual-report/en.html


Looking at this source, your figures are correct on the surface.
However, they still don't compute.
Nearly 70% of Porsche's 2015 sales consisted of Macan and Cayenne
CUVs which wouldn't have brought in anything close to an average of 107K per unit. Another nearly 10% of 2015 sales were Cayman/Boxster cars and they aren't 107K a copy either.
So, either the remaining 48.5K 911 and Panamera sales all occurred at really eye-watering prices or the figure given by Porsche as "sales" includes revenues other than from sales of cars, like engineering and design services.
There were 588 918 deliveries and while their prices would have flirted with a million a copy, their unique design and limited production volume cannot have made them especially profitable to build.
 
Still no response to the Porsche hybrid from 115 years ago?

Conveniently avoiding that fact?

Tesla didn't invent anything. They simply had better battery (and motor controller) technology when they brought their car to market.

In the 1905 - 1915 era, electric cars were superior to gasoline. No broken arms from cranking the engine, no finicky carburetor so, no manual ignition advance to get the engine to run properly. Just get in, step on the pedal and go.

So, Tesla copied a bunch of 100 year old designs. It's batteries and a motor.

Hardly new, innovative, or unique.
 
Originally Posted By: fdcg27


Looking at this source, your figures are correct on the surface.
However, they still don't compute.
Nearly 70% of Porsche's 2015 sales consisted of Macan and Cayenne
CUVs which wouldn't have brought in anything close to an average of 107K per unit. Another nearly 10% of 2015 sales were Cayman/Boxster cars and they aren't 107K a copy either.
So, either the remaining 48.5K 911 and Panamera sales all occurred at really eye-watering prices or the figure given by Porsche as "sales" includes revenues other than from sales of cars, like engineering and design services.
There were 588 918 deliveries and while their prices would have flirted with a million a copy, their unique design and limited production volume cannot have made them especially profitable to build.


Porsche merchandising will have an influence aswell.
 
You are of course referring to the Lohner-Porsche, which was more an effort to eliminate the need for any sort of reduction gearing or transmission than an early example of a modern hybrid design.
The concept is similar to that of a diesel-electric ship or railway locomotive in that the engine drives a generator but never the wheels directly.
It isn't in any way similar to the design and operation of any modern hybrid road vehicle and the concept has largely been supplanted with hydrostatic drive used for the same purpose in most terrestrial applications.
Looked at another way, everybody has followed Toyota's lead in hybrid road vehicle design while nobody emulated the Lohner-Porsche. It was an enormously heavy evolutionary dead end in the design of cars.
 
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
Why Porsche is copying Tesla idea/design ? If Tesla didn't successful with their vehicles Porsche would not copying Tesla designs to make their own Mission-E that will be available by 2020.

Did Porsche invented/marketed an EV with Li-on battery and 200+ miles range before Tesla ?

Who is copying whom ?


You're missing out on the one important thing:

Tesla left all the items for their cars as open source.
That means anyone can copy their cars, and Tesla has no problems with it.

If Tesla doesn't have an issue with Porsche copying their vehicles, why do you?

Honestly, you can't really call a vehicle that has 4 doors, 4 tires, a steering wheel, an electric motor and a whole bunch of batteries in it a copy. If you're going to go with that loose of a definition, then the MB S class is copying the Nissan Sentra, as they both have 4 doors, 4 tires, a gasoline powered engine, and a steering wheel.

BC.
 
Why are we talking about electric cars anyway ? If there were nothing but electric cars on the road, we wouldn't have this forum!

39.gif
Electric Cars
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top