Originally Posted By: dailydriver
I believe that post is aimed squarely at CATERHAM, and anyone who even slightly/partially agrees with his "school of thought", BUT let's NOT 'war' over this, as it is not worth it to do so.
Wasn't "aimed" at anyone...there are a number of posters who claim that 0W is better even at 100F in Dallas Texas not just his uber sensitive fanbois.
Take M1 AFE 0W30 versus 5W30, clearly that, as a generalisation is a falsity. Raise that, in a thread, get called a "hater", or told that I'm always going after CATERHAM, or that I'm envious of his pretty cars...LOL Haters...no answers as to how two oils of identical characteristics above freezing can display a "massive advantage", just "hater"
I'll bring some more "technical obfuscation" (not my phrase, search where it comes from) to the thread, WRT the topic of oil flow to rocker arms,and pertinent to the older engine comment.
Engine in question, started on a variety of oils at a variety of temperatures...with a positive displacement pump, and finite gallery volume, the engine can't fill any quicker with a properly pumpable oil, whether it's 0W, 5W, or indeed no W...in this case, it's about 6 seonds to full oil pressure, and 3-5 for rocker arm oiling.
SAE30 (no W) does it at 30F (freezing), didn't get it done at 20F
10W didn't get it done at 9F, about the same as the SE30 at 20F
5W gets it done at 12F, and at -11F is about the same as the 10W at 9F, and the SAE30 at 20F.
Put any of those oils at 35F, and they will pump exactly the same volume, fill at exactly the same rates, and provide exactly the same "protection".
the W rating is the cold temperature cranking and pumpability, it does NOT bestow any magical protection at temperatures above that which it promises...the limits of pumpability.