Alright! Well. If I may.. One of the wonderful things about this here board is that we encompass users from all over the world. I would think that most the users here are from the contiguous 48 States
however, we have the whole world on this board.
We also have what I feel is the classic the "North" (I was raised in New York State) and then the "South" (anything Virginia and lower, as I understand it.)
I preface this thread with that because the topic was recently touched on, about hunting, and how that relates to a source of food.
I was invited to start a topic on the matter, rather than do a de-rail.
I'm not locked in to any perceptions I have about anything, so I feel that with the vast wealth of hunters, viewpoints, and people from different geographic locations, this could be a great topic.
So, let's begin..
TO ME, hunting and food are two totally different things. I've never hunted, never wanted to hunt, and do follow what I feel would be your more "Northener" view that hunting game could really only be justified if you are going to eat the animal. More on that later.
It IS possible that my view of not being a fan of hunting could be in the context of hunting for sport, buck antlers on walls, bears in poses in offices, trophy kills, things like that. Or even mink coats. "Fur is murder" was a popular protest point when I was young. Faux/fake fur? Fine. Actual fur? ... !
Now, with the vast population of hunters here. I would make one very key distinction that should basically put the matter to rest.. If you are hunting to eat, there absolutely isn't anything wrong with that! Why would there be? However you hunt, whatever you hunt.. You're feeding yourself. Why on earth would there be a problem with that!!
Now, let's pivot to how this ties in with food sources.
So. Everything I know from growing up etc has told me that "cows and chickens" .. okay, they are basically bred for the slaughter. The large expanses of farms, I know chickens they have basically "breeding houses" where the birds get as fat as they can and then they are both "harvested."
To me, Harvesting is not hunting.
I'm not sure how you could even compare the two. You have cows, which have no life other than to live and get fat and then die to be made into meat for our human consumptions, killed en masse in a controlled environment. Now, in real life, we don't have movies like Hard Target or The Most Dangerous Game, where humans hunt humans.. We hunt the animals, in the wild.
Those animals are not multiplied in a controlled environment. They are free.
Those animals will go on to have their lives, in the woods and wilderness, until they either die of age, the elements, or eaten by another animal. The way of nature.
Those animals only become food if the human imposes the will to hunt, kill, and then eat ?? the animal. This also is the way of the wild.
It seems totally different to me than the controlled slaughter houses that produce meat.
The books I have read about how some argue that meat is not good for you because of the high stress manner in which the fatted calf is killed, releasing endorphens and toxins into the meat aside, I am not sure how hunting could be compared to the way in which the meat in our supermarket comes packaged, different brand names, etc etc.
So then. I was told this could turn into an education on the matter.. So, with that.. I yield the floor! Let's let the information begin??

We also have what I feel is the classic the "North" (I was raised in New York State) and then the "South" (anything Virginia and lower, as I understand it.)
I preface this thread with that because the topic was recently touched on, about hunting, and how that relates to a source of food.
I was invited to start a topic on the matter, rather than do a de-rail.
I'm not locked in to any perceptions I have about anything, so I feel that with the vast wealth of hunters, viewpoints, and people from different geographic locations, this could be a great topic.
So, let's begin..
TO ME, hunting and food are two totally different things. I've never hunted, never wanted to hunt, and do follow what I feel would be your more "Northener" view that hunting game could really only be justified if you are going to eat the animal. More on that later.
It IS possible that my view of not being a fan of hunting could be in the context of hunting for sport, buck antlers on walls, bears in poses in offices, trophy kills, things like that. Or even mink coats. "Fur is murder" was a popular protest point when I was young. Faux/fake fur? Fine. Actual fur? ... !
Now, with the vast population of hunters here. I would make one very key distinction that should basically put the matter to rest.. If you are hunting to eat, there absolutely isn't anything wrong with that! Why would there be? However you hunt, whatever you hunt.. You're feeding yourself. Why on earth would there be a problem with that!!
Now, let's pivot to how this ties in with food sources.
So. Everything I know from growing up etc has told me that "cows and chickens" .. okay, they are basically bred for the slaughter. The large expanses of farms, I know chickens they have basically "breeding houses" where the birds get as fat as they can and then they are both "harvested."
To me, Harvesting is not hunting.
I'm not sure how you could even compare the two. You have cows, which have no life other than to live and get fat and then die to be made into meat for our human consumptions, killed en masse in a controlled environment. Now, in real life, we don't have movies like Hard Target or The Most Dangerous Game, where humans hunt humans.. We hunt the animals, in the wild.
Those animals are not multiplied in a controlled environment. They are free.
Those animals will go on to have their lives, in the woods and wilderness, until they either die of age, the elements, or eaten by another animal. The way of nature.
Those animals only become food if the human imposes the will to hunt, kill, and then eat ?? the animal. This also is the way of the wild.
It seems totally different to me than the controlled slaughter houses that produce meat.
The books I have read about how some argue that meat is not good for you because of the high stress manner in which the fatted calf is killed, releasing endorphens and toxins into the meat aside, I am not sure how hunting could be compared to the way in which the meat in our supermarket comes packaged, different brand names, etc etc.
So then. I was told this could turn into an education on the matter.. So, with that.. I yield the floor! Let's let the information begin??