Originally Posted By: Astro14
In this video, the dog was visible for less than a second. The view was partially blocked by the officer's body. There was no sound. We don't see the dog before it comes out. We don't know why the officer was there.
The dog was moving quickly, toward the officer and got within a foot or two. The officer fired. That's all we can really see from the clip.
How, on the basis of that scant information, can you reasonably judge that dog's behavior? Without being able to clearly see the dog's actions?
The officer had a clear view. The officer could hear the dog. The officer saw what happened in the seconds prior to the dog coming through the door.
And we still haven't heard the officer's side of the story. We've been presented one side of the story. That doesn't give us the tools to judge.
I basically agree.
The dog came out of the house very fast and charged towards the officer. Not being able to hear if the dog was whining like a happy dog, or growling like a dog on the attack, I can't say what the dog's intent was. I can only go by the dog bursting out of the door and making a beeline as fast as it could towards the officer. To me based on that it appears it was an aggressive move not curiosity.
My dog for instance goes absolutely NUTS when someone shows up. She is a friendly dog like none other( Black Lab ). However, it is very clear she is friendly and not being aggressive. While she moves quickly to the person she is whining/yipping( happy noises ), she approaches almost half crouched down with her ears down( submissive act not aggressive ), and her tail is wagging so fast and hard it basically swings her butt side to side as well. She even sort of runs back and forth between the person and me she is so excited to see someone that she doesn't know where to go. Even the most inexperienced person with dogs could tell she is just happy to see them. The dog in the video bursts from the door and charges at full speed towards the officer. I see no signs of being friendly just a full on charge. Not saying the dog was attacking just that it is something I can understand the officer believing at least based on visual evidence.
I do have a couple questions I would like to know about though...?
1 - why was the officer there? Was he there just to ask a question or for a complaint( about the dog maybe? ), warrant, etc... Was he prepared for some type of violence from the inhabitants prior to knocking on the door? His bearing to me was one of an officer expecting something to happen above and beyond normal procedure.
2 - why did the homeowner let the dog loose? You NEVER let your dog loose like that with a stranger and especially with an LEO. You secure the dog before opening the door. Homeowner bears some responsibility due to that.
3 - why was the dog being fostered? Was it a stray, was it a dog given up because the previous owner couldn't afford to keep it or fix some type of illness/injury, or could this have possibly been an aggressive dog in rehabilitation?
I love my dogs like they were my kids and I would be devastated if my dog was killed. With that sad though, from what little I see in the video, the officer appeared to be defending himself from a dog charging him. I see no wrong doing with the little I know. Even if the dog was friendly and just "curious" as the owner said the way it charged the officer doesn't portray that kind of friendly response. It portrays an aggressive one.
The homeowner should have secured that dog prior to opening the door. You holler to the officer I am putting my dog away and then you do that before opening the door. You don't open the door and let the dog out.