Wouldn't the PCV system help get rid of the gas in the oil system eventually?
well, it's fixed now so obviously this was to blame. i must say this really puzzles me, though. LT1, right? the coil wire on the LT1 comes nowhere close to the exhaust. it's a short little thing going from the coil on the front of the cylinder head directly to the opti.quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
They found that the coil wire was very badly burned, it came out of it's holder and was up against the exhaust manifold.
I'll see how the car performs at the next dragstrip outing before I bother with the spark plugs. It's a major task changing the plugs on these engines.quote:
Originally posted by Mike:
Change the spark plugs and change the oil ASAP.
When the plugs get soaked with fuel they get deposits on them and that will lead to decreased performance, especially on cold starts. You will not notice this but it will be happening. There was a service bulletin back in the late 90's that addressed this concern with fuel soaked plugs.
Yep, it's an LT1. I was a bit puzzled when the service manager said that too, as I didn't think the wire came close to either of the manifolds either. But I figured maybe the cheap aftermarket wire set I had put on used longer wires or otherwise the service manager got his info mixed up on exactly how the wire got burned.quote:
Originally posted by Michael SR:
well, it's fixed now so obviously this was to blame. i must say this really puzzles me, though. LT1, right? the coil wire on the LT1 comes nowhere close to the exhaust. it's a short little thing going from the coil on the front of the cylinder head directly to the opti.quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
They found that the coil wire was very badly burned, it came out of it's holder and was up against the exhaust manifold.
-michael
The car is my daily driver, 365 days a year, so that's why I'm leaning towards doing the oil change at the 5000km mark. This is a long enough period to give us a good idea of how the fuel affected the wear numbers, but not too long to cause any lasting damage. Oil pressure is exactly as it was before, and no strange noises, so I'm not worried about leaving it in there for a little bit longer. I might see a bit more wear but I doubt it would be catastrophic.quote:
Originally posted by 1 FMF:
here's my 2 cents:
I don't remember from reading if your LT1 is a dragstrip only car, but if you do some daily driving I say leave the oil in and do an oil sample at 5000km (3106.856 miles). This way we can see a UOA on how the GC holds up to some fuel dilution from been flooded ( a real world condition). After all, isn't that what UOA's are for? And if the UOA shows high fuel, low TBN, bad visc numbers, then you can at least feel better about dumping it early.
But if you've now run for a few miles at normal temps, the fuel is GONE! So any effect the fuel had on your wear numbers has already happened, and you aren't going to save any damage by dumping good oil too earlyquote:
Originally posted by Patman:
The car is my daily driver, 365 days a year, so that's why I'm leaning towards doing the oil change at the 5000km mark. This is a long enough period to give us a good idea of how the fuel affected the wear numbers, but not too long to cause any lasting damage. Oil pressure is exactly as it was before, and no strange noises, so I'm not worried about leaving it in there for a little bit longer. I might see a bit more wear but I doubt it would be catastrophic.quote:
Originally posted by 1 FMF:
here's my 2 cents:
I don't remember from reading if your LT1 is a dragstrip only car, but if you do some daily driving I say leave the oil in and do an oil sample at 5000km (3106.856 miles). This way we can see a UOA on how the GC holds up to some fuel dilution from been flooded ( a real world condition). After all, isn't that what UOA's are for? And if the UOA shows high fuel, low TBN, bad visc numbers, then you can at least feel better about dumping it early.
The UOA on it will definitely be informative!
It is also possible though, that with a lot of fuel being in there all at once, that during that time the oil was degraded enough to do some slight wear damage. Not to mention it's TBN might be affected too. I'm also worried about the effect all of my misfiring might have had on the engine too, and all of the excessive idling that the engine saw during it's time in the service bay. All of these things add up to a very real possibility that I've got higher amounts of wear metals in there. Plus as I mentioned too, I really like the idea of getting to see a full 10,000km run on this oil from May to September (where it would see warm temps only), instead of having one 10,000km run from March to July and then one 10,000km run from July to late October, where in both cases there would be cold temps.quote:
Originally posted by Tree Hugger:
But if you've now run for a few miles at normal temps, the fuel is GONE! So any effect the fuel had on your wear numbers has already happened, and you aren't going to save any damage by dumping good oil too early
Terry Dyson responded to me yesterday and told me I would be safe to run my full interval if I wanted to. I'm splitting it down the middle I guess, by doing it earlier than normal. I think the wear numbers will be a little higher, but not alarmingly so. I'm confident the oil will still show itself to be serviceable, but not quite up to my picky standards perhaps.quote:
Originally posted by Mike:
Well its your car, I would have changed the oil right away even if I had dumped in Amsoil the day before. Anything that contaminates the oil is not good for the engine. There are lot of harmful additives in today fuels and the effect they could have on the engine in the big unknown.
To me, its just to big a risk to take.