Firefox is gaining strength

Status
Not open for further replies.
I used firefox for about 6 months and then went back to slimbrowser. It is IE based, but has many more features than IE (tabbed browsing, auto log-in, pop-up blocker, ect). I just never found firefox to do anything more than slimbrowser does, and slimbrowser seems to run better. Not sure if it still leaves all the vulneralbilities as IE (probably) but oh well. Thats what fire walls and Virus protection is for.
 
News today that Firefox is approaching the 50 million download mark.

That makes this month's 23.9% browser hit-rate for Firefox more believeable than the sub 6% number I've seen elsewhere.
 
quote:

Originally posted by cangreylegend:
Yes, but when I upgraded my 5 year old PC with a new MB, CPU, PC3200 Ram and SCSI card it only cost me $75 after I sold off my old parts. Now try that with a 5 year old Apple!

i don't need to upgrade my 5 year old apple.
grin.gif
it's seen 0 upgrades, while my work box has had hundreds of dollars of upgrades to keep it current. and my old imac at home is still faster and more stable.

that said, i just bought new shiny laptops for me and the wife. midpoint ibooks, about $1000 each.
 
I hear you. I'm fed up with the spyware and it has cost us, but unfortunately at work our customer's have sites that require IE to work and do business with them.
mad.gif


I am just waiting for the day when a customer mandates we throw away Novell and go Windows Server in order to keep their business. That's when I do the Pontius Pilate thing.
lol.gif


Unfortunately in business you don't get to select your best software, it just gets mandated by some by company you do business with.
 
quote:

Originally posted by kreigle:

quote:

Originally posted by Tim H.:
And what about MAC OS? if it is so good, why are people not buying up every disc in sight and installing it after buying thier brand new 'puter??


Because to run MAC OS, you need a MAC! PCs are dirt cheap compared to Macs because Apple has kept the architecture closed and proprietary, so they can charge whatever they want.

My brother has a Mac and will never go back. My parents were looking at new Macs since my dad is increasingly frustrated with Windows, but even a refurbished Mac is 3 times what they would pay for a brand new PC.


you can get a mac mini for $499. if you compare mac and wintel boxes feature to feature, there is virtually no worthwhile cost difference.

besides, after you buy all the anti-virus and spyware and miscellaneous crap to keep the windows box running it's not even close.
 
Yes, but when I upgraded my 5 year old PC with a new MB, CPU, PC3200 Ram and SCSI card it only cost me $75 after I sold off my old parts. Now try that with a 5 year old Apple!
 
Interesting to see Microsoft flattening out the growth of Firefox.

ou couldn't pay me enough to use IE on a regular basis. We just had a piece of spyware infiltrate one person's fully patched computer via IE, play havoc with the network!

I wonder if Microsoft's marketing machine will slow Firefox's growth even more. Seems to me all the "news" about the next Windows Vista/Foghorn/Leghorn is typical Microsoft in their attempt to stifle competition in the pre-pre-release "vapor-ware" phase. It won't be released for at least 1 year, probably slipping into 2007 with their track record.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
Are there some new stats?

Yes, in the news today:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122213,00.asp

quote:

Microsoft's Internet Explorer halted the steady market share advance of The Mozilla Foundation's Firefox browser in July, a Web site monitoring company announced last week.

Last month, IE, by far the most used browser, regained lost ground and pushed back the upstart Firefox for the first time since version 1.0 of the open source browser debuted late last year, according to NetApplications.com, an Aliso Viejo, California, maker of applications for monitoring and measuring Web site usage.

Firefox's share shrunk to 8.07 percent from 8.71 percent in June, while IE grew its market slice to 87.20 percent in July from 86.56 percent last month.

Between January and June of this year, Firefox had posted monthly market share gains of between 0.5 percent and 1 percent at the expense of IE, according to NetApplications.com, which compiles its browser usage data from more than 40,000 Web sites monitored by its HitsLink.com service.

 
I use 'Fox but latelly it has been unstable. I have wiped it, re-installed but is still showing signs of crashes and un-able to open certian sites it used to run just fine.
 
I've completely switched over to Fx. And convinced a few of the relatives too although some are tough and resistant to my zealous Mozilla Propoganda .

Just over one year ago I read an interesting article about dying companies—one of them being MS (as per this fellow's opinion):

The health of established firms, especially great ones, is more difficult to diagnose. The balance sheet can give some clues, but, because it captures the recent past rather than the near future, it can fool you. Most veteran reporters look at more subtle clues, like the comings and goings of key employees, slippage in the release dates of new products (or missing features), and subtle shifts in the tone of company news releases, advertisements and executive speeches.

But most of all, at least for me, there is the smell test: the faintest whiff of decay that comes from dying companies.



ABC News: Silicon Insider: R.I.P. Microsoft?
 
I still use IE, as it's habit. I used to be a loyal Netscape user, but the redesign that made it more like IE turned me off.

I do use Firefox thhough, when I'm offshore. For some reason, IE is much slower and less reliable over the firewalled net-nannied connection out there, where Firefox plain works, anytime there is any connection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom