I am just curious, how many of you do extended drain on M1 EP or Amsoil while the car is under warranty? If something goes south, is the dealer going to ask you to produce all your oil change receipts to prove that you have followed their OCI?
Extended Drain under Warranty - How are they going to know?
- Thread starter Jonny Z
- Start date
- Status
Yes, they will. And they will send your oil off for analysis. BUT, they have to show that the failure ISN'T the oil's fault. This is why you should get a UOA in this situation from a 3rd party.
The manufacturer rep will ask if they think they can pawn off an engine related failure - in some ways, rightly so - if the engine was sludged, for example.
It's unlikely you would ever be in this position, but I always recommend either staying within the MAX car recommended OCI or, indeed, only extending beyond with a UOA. JUST to avoid the fight (or lying)!
It's unlikely you would ever be in this position, but I always recommend either staying within the MAX car recommended OCI or, indeed, only extending beyond with a UOA. JUST to avoid the fight (or lying)!
The two things that are keeping me from going ED are
1) Got 4.5 years of warranty left on my ride (Toyota Extra Mile)
2) I *enjoy* changing oil.
1) Got 4.5 years of warranty left on my ride (Toyota Extra Mile)
2) I *enjoy* changing oil.
Warranty or not, new or used, everyone would be well advised to keep receipts for oil changes (and other work) for the the life of the car. They might come in handy down the road when you need to prove something to the manufacturer.
I log all the activities in Excel. Receipts I don't keep, or I will have to file them away.
Start keeping them as real proof that the manufacturer will accept. They will fight you tooth and nail. Pop into the library and read Consumer Reports August 2005 issue p. 49 about sludge-prone models.
We went through this at the dealership. It mystifies me how someone burns $45K on a car and neglects it.
You will be required to have receipts of oil changes, in lieu of that, dated receipts of purchase of oil and filters. Safest, if not most convenient, is to have the dealership do the services while in warranty to leave no wiggle room in case of a problem.
I know it tears up some of you, but the manufacturer sets the warranty rules.
You will be required to have receipts of oil changes, in lieu of that, dated receipts of purchase of oil and filters. Safest, if not most convenient, is to have the dealership do the services while in warranty to leave no wiggle room in case of a problem.
I know it tears up some of you, but the manufacturer sets the warranty rules.
i recommend an annual oil analysis if you want to run extended drains while under warranty. oil analysis is considered legal proof that the oil is still servicable.
only abnormal contamination from coolant, fuel, dirt and,or or a mechanical defect will cause catastrophic failure of a low mileage engine....
Tooslick
only abnormal contamination from coolant, fuel, dirt and,or or a mechanical defect will cause catastrophic failure of a low mileage engine....
Tooslick
After the recently visit by GM engineer Allen Cline here on BITOG, the effectiveness of an UOA has been questioned.
In addition, the inexpensive oil analysis widely used on this site does NOT detect the ZDDP concentration in the oil, which from an OEM standpoint is a more accurate way of determining oil life. Thus, a $30 oil analysis may not satisfy an OEM engineer that the oil was suitable for continued use.
My
is on.
Michael
Thus, an engineer sent out by the vehicle's manufacturer could EASILY question the validity of the oil sample taken by the owner and reviewed by a 3rd Party Lab, since in the event of an engine failure, the engine is probably inoperable.
In addition, the inexpensive oil analysis widely used on this site does NOT detect the ZDDP concentration in the oil, which from an OEM standpoint is a more accurate way of determining oil life. Thus, a $30 oil analysis may not satisfy an OEM engineer that the oil was suitable for continued use.
My
Michael
Oh also, how do they know the samples that you have sent off recently or in the past, showing that the engine and your oil brand show that it has lasted 8K miles in the past, was not in fact taken with a "T" sampling device that is plumbed to the oil pressure sensor?
It shows the amount of ZDDP in the oil, but does NOT show the CONCENTRATION of the ZDDP.
MW
First, few people know that have a "T" sampling sampling device plumbed to the oil pressure sensor is the ideal way to take a sample.
Second, I'm referring to the sample collected at the time that the engine failed.
MW
2003TRD,
I'm not sure if this is the right example, but say you have 4oz of Substance A mixed in 12 ounces of Substance B to form Solution A.
Then, you have 4oz of Substance A mixed with 20 ounces of Substance B to form Solution B.
Wouldn't a lab test show that both solution A and solution B have 4 ounces of Substance A?
However, if the engineer is not satisfied with those 6-10UOAs in predicting oil life, then how would they use those as a basis that the oil has been able to make it to 8K.
Michael
I'm not sure if this is the right example, but say you have 4oz of Substance A mixed in 12 ounces of Substance B to form Solution A.
Then, you have 4oz of Substance A mixed with 20 ounces of Substance B to form Solution B.
Wouldn't a lab test show that both solution A and solution B have 4 ounces of Substance A?
However, if the engineer is not satisfied with those 6-10UOAs in predicting oil life, then how would they use those as a basis that the oil has been able to make it to 8K.
Michael
Real world, the dealerships do not want to replace anything under warranty if they feel there is a possibility that they don't have to.
Also, few engines would not make it through an ordinary warranty period unless abused and neglected.
JMO
Also, few engines would not make it through an ordinary warranty period unless abused and neglected.
JMO
No, not really. They only get to set the rules within the tight constraints of the Moss-Magnuson Warranty Act. Anything that they try to impose on you, or any advantage they try to take, that contradicts the MMWA simply won't hold water if push comes to shove (that is, you end up in court). Of course, I'm also a big believer that the best way to win a fight is to avoid it in the first place (on acceptable terms, naturally). The internet is full of stuff on Moss-Magnuson. If you're getting pushed around, you need a lawyer. I find equally amazing people's unwillingness to avail themselves of the courts when they're getting screwed over a $45k car.
Michael:quote:
Originally posted by Michael Wan:
After the recently visit by GM engineer Allen Cline here on BITOG, the effectiveness of an UOA has been questioned.
Thus, an engineer sent out by the vehicle's manufacturer could EASILY question the validity of the oil sample taken by the owner and reviewed by a 3rd Party Lab, since in the event of an engine failure, the engine is probably inoperable.
In addition, the inexpensive oil analysis widely used on this site does NOT detect the ZDDP concentration in the oil, which from an OEM standpoint is a more accurate way of determining oil life. Thus, a $30 oil analysis may not satisfy an OEM engineer that the oil was suitable for continued use.
Myis on.
Michael
I'm a little perplexed by the apparent focus on ZDDP level. Seems odd, especially since with the change to the SM standard, there's considerably less of the stuff in the oil in the first place.
Second, implicit in your position is an assumption that used oil analysis promises conclusive proof of the condition of the engine and oil at the time it was drawn. Clearly, it does not. Many uncontrolled variables may impact upon the reliability of any given oil sample. This does not, however, suggest that even inexpensive tests are worthless. It's not an all or nothing thing. You have to look at the particular sample, the conditions under which it was drawn, and the lab that tested it, before you can decide how much weight to accord the particular results. I would never let an auto mfr tell me a UOA was worthless (unless it was obviously bad).
- Status