- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,799
I'd like to hear of your 'road trip' philosophy. I'm heading up to Wellsville, NY tomorrow ..and I'd normally be traveling along the route that I used to take my oldest daughter to college. You go a bit out of your way ..pay a toll ..but, naturally, travel faster. The trip is extremely boring. I-80 is pretty barren between where the NE extension of the PA turnpike meets it and Williamsport. You can safely (as far as speed enforcement) travel @ 70 mph ..but the road almost demands 90 mph to keep you awake. Now if you have a decent amount of traffic
..that may keep you entertained ..but otherwise ..it sucks.
The alternate route isn't 4 lane travel ..goes through the former coal regions ..but is 45 miles shorter and has no tolls ($4.50) ..so the economics works out.
Mapquest puts the difference at (roughly) 5 hours/265 miles vs. 6 hours/220 miles.
Seeing that my bladder isn't what it used to be, these times will be extended
There are rest room facilities on I-80.
So ..do you demand "light speed" just for the sake of light speed? Or if the hour really doesn't seem worth all that effort to save ..do you take the slow road???
In most of my trips ..there's no debate. When I go to New England ..there's not any time/distance to be saved. When I go to western PA ..I tried the slow road (Rt. 30) and really learned that mountains do exist on the eastern side of the nation ..and wonder how anything made it from point A to point B with this road as the original transcontinental thoroughfare. We have obscure, rural ..back in the woods roads that are more "advanced" than Rt. 30 in some places. It would have been interesting if it wasn't so much work.
I'm doing this trip ..as I did the others mentioned ..alone if that alters your perception at all.
The alternate route isn't 4 lane travel ..goes through the former coal regions ..but is 45 miles shorter and has no tolls ($4.50) ..so the economics works out.
Mapquest puts the difference at (roughly) 5 hours/265 miles vs. 6 hours/220 miles.
Seeing that my bladder isn't what it used to be, these times will be extended
So ..do you demand "light speed" just for the sake of light speed? Or if the hour really doesn't seem worth all that effort to save ..do you take the slow road???
In most of my trips ..there's no debate. When I go to New England ..there's not any time/distance to be saved. When I go to western PA ..I tried the slow road (Rt. 30) and really learned that mountains do exist on the eastern side of the nation ..and wonder how anything made it from point A to point B with this road as the original transcontinental thoroughfare. We have obscure, rural ..back in the woods roads that are more "advanced" than Rt. 30 in some places. It would have been interesting if it wasn't so much work.
I'm doing this trip ..as I did the others mentioned ..alone if that alters your perception at all.