My MB diesel was 21 years old, had 228k on it, and was simple to work on, got 30 MPG, and never really needed anything. Granted, Im pretty @nal about PM.
super reliable...
My father has a 96 E300D that now is almost at 170k. Same great longevity, more MPG (~36 on average), and more safety (though my 83 got me through a severe rear-ending safe as could be, to which Im eternally greatful to daimler-benz). Thing is, it has more electronics, which do go bad, and as of now, my father is driving my mother's ~29-30 MPG plymouth breeze over his 35-36 MPG MB diesel. Reason? Not because anything is awry with the MB, but becaue its cheaper to drive a regular gas car than it is to drive the higher MPG diesel, at this point.
As far as I can tell, from knowing a number of people with Jettas, the problem isnt that its a diesel, the problem is that its a VW.
Diesels are very reliable, and dont need any different PM than any other car in reality. Spark plugs and wires are a wash compared to glow plugs, more or less. There is less to tune up in a diesel, and IMO less to go wrong. If emissions dont matter, you can drive the diesel engine until it ingests its oil sump and seizes on itself... try that with a ga$$er. Other than the fact that oil sumps are usually larger, there isnt much of a difference. Do a few UOAs to figuree out soot loading (keep it below 2%), and you can do extended drains and everything. Of course, if you were replacing a long block, the diesel would be more, but I assume this is a non-issue.
When Honda brings a diesel, oh how excellent it will be, though it will likely be nearly unservicable, parts will be located in hard to reach or just plain dumb spots, and rubber parts will all need to be replaced in about 5 years...
Maybe toyota will bring a good diesel!
JMH