Do certain brands of oils go better with certain engines?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
14
Location
Madison, Al
Are certain brands of oils or synths a better fit (do a better job) with certain brands/types of engines? Myth or reality??? I'm talking brands, not viscosity. We all want the best performance/protection possible from our oil. Just wondering if you guys have found good "matches" for your engines. I guess to really know this info it will require UOA.
 
It definitely seems like Toyota's like Mobil 1 oil. It's too bad not too many other engines seem to like Mobil 1.
smile.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Patman:
It's too bad not too many other engines seem to like Mobil 1.
smile.gif


Well! That's the first time I've ever seen an administrator troll on his own board.
shocked.gif
 
Hi Patman,
yes and Volga, Moskvich, Tatra and many Trabants have always gone well on Amsoil
wink.gif


It can be used to rust proof theses cars too!
smile.gif


Seriously, IMHO some engine families appear to perform better when the viscosity is optimised. As for Brands - I really don't know!!

Regards
Doug
 
It would be more accurate to say that engines having good design and high quality metallurgy do fine with any lubricant.

Engines with marginal designs and/or subpar metallurgy (cheaper bearings,cast rather than forged crankshafts,no micropolishing of parts,sloppy tolerances, etc), require better lubricants to show low rates of wear. In this latter case the lubricant is a "bandaid" that is helping to mask design deficiencies.
 
quote:

It would be more accurate to say that engines having good design and high quality metallurgy do fine with any lubricant.

Engines with marginal designs and/or subpar metallurgy (cheaper bearings,cast rather than forged crankshafts,no micropolishing of parts,sloppy tolerances, etc), require better lubricants to show low rates of wear. In this latter case the lubricant is a "bandaid" that is helping to mask design deficiencies.

Agree 100%. Ulitimately, if one is concerned about keeping a vehicle for a long time, more time should be spent researching the engine type/make/manufacturer/materials then the proper oil. I bought my Toyota for one reason - to last. And it did with ZERO problems. Just a good engine, period.
 
quote:

Originally posted by TooSlick:
It would be more accurate to say that engines having good design and high quality metallurgy do fine with any lubricant.

Engines with marginal designs and/or subpar metallurgy (cheaper bearings,cast rather than forged crankshafts,no micropolishing of parts,sloppy tolerances, etc), require better lubricants to show low rates of wear. In this latter case the lubricant is a "bandaid" that is helping to mask design deficiencies.


This is a nice description of the issue. However, certain designs do impose particular loads on the lubricant that another design may not. By example, even a competent turbocharger design will typically place some thermal stresses on the lubricant. Chain driven camshafts can present a differing shear load than a belt driven arrangement. This can become a consideration in lubricant selection when an optimal match is sought.

But good engines tend to be good engines on any good oil.
 
I think most oil companys make a product for most applications today. As they age they make High Mileage etc if needed.So for the Brand to fit the car best the answer is most all of the major oil companys have the best oil.
smile.gif
 
My 4.0 Jeep engine is running well on Mobil 1 10w30 since the first oil change at ~2,500 miles and now has 196,000 on. How long it will last is unknown since my nephew has it. In addition: my Subaru 2.5L engine 92,000 miles is going great as did my Volvo and Saab turbo. The Volvo and Saab was sold with 176,000 and 145,000 miles and running well with no oil added between 5-6,000 mile oil changes. Since I bought all new and broke then in by not babying nor jam them I feel that using Mobil 1 was one reason for my very good service. ed
 
another consideration- some engine designs are more prone to sludging problems than others- these engines will stay cleaner if oils are chosen that have better detergency, combined with shorter OCIs. (Almost all synthetics clean better than dinos, but from my understanding, castrol GTX dino is considered to be a pretty good "cleaning" dino) Some folks with severe sluding, may have to resort to additional cleaning addatives.... but a switch to a diesel certified synthetic like delvac 1 can provide some solid cleaning. (diesel engines deal with heavier loads of soot and carbon buildup, the diesel spacific oils are better designed to deal with this.)
 
Had 300K+ miles on a 350 Chevy using nothing but 10w-40 Havoline dino for 16yrs - this was a hauling truck, towing heavy loads at moderate highway speeds through the flat-lands, hills and mountain tops in all ranges of temps.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Canyoncrew:
Are certain brands of oils or synths a better fit (do a better job) with certain brands/types of engines? Myth or reality??? I'm talking brands, not viscosity. We all want the best performance/protection possible from our oil. Just wondering if you guys have found good "matches" for your engines. I guess to really know this info it will require UOA.

I think in general the brand is not as important as the selection of the oil within the several offered by each maker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom