Current NOACKs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
392
Location
Central Florida
Where can someone like myself find current NOACKs to compair? Ive spent the better part of last night and this morning looking throughout BITOG, but after doing so, I realized all of this research was old news...and of the old news, I found these values to be conflicting, dependent upon where they came from. So...any place I can find current, consistant NOACK values?
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2002
Messages
1,412
Location
Falls Church VA
You can find the NOACKs for a number of 10W-30 in the oil study published on the amsoil corporate web site. Haven't seen a lot of companies eager to publish that particular piece of info on their own oils.
 

ShortBuSX

Thread starter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
392
Location
Central Florida
But everything Ive read around here, somewhat disputes those numbers...alot of posters refer to NOACK numbers, but when they refer to them are they refering to the Amsoil site? Do we actually believe those numbers or is it just marketing? Besides the most current NOACK I read on the Ams site is dated 2003...not very current.
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
1,251
Location
Akron, OH
I think that as a whole, this board doesn't put much stock in NOACK numbers. I'm sure many board members do pay attention to them, but I've also seen people argue that you can cheat on that test by doping your oil with a given additive load-out that won't neccessarily profit you in any application. Except for NOACK testing. When I was first learning about oils, though, I do have to say I was very impressed by Amsoil's little charts. I wish everyone was as forthcoming with numbers and charts as Amsoil is. Heck, I can't even find out the TBN on Pennzoil Platinum on their stinking web site.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
48,070
Location
Everson WA - Pacific NW USA
If a company won't print it's NOACK numbers, then you are pretty much out of luck. I don't know of an independent site with regularly updated NOACK numbers. The Amsoil data is somewhat dated, but there it is. It's not just made up crap. The rate and temperature of oil evaporation is very important in real life applications. As for the accuracy of ASTM D-5800, for example - I actually have no idea.
 

ShortBuSX

Thread starter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
392
Location
Central Florida
See this is my point... Heres Amsoils data...  - Heres Terrys data from this link... Volatility D5800/SAVLAB VOL % ATM12.06 GC 11.28 M1 9.77 RL 6.85 And then a NOACK type test from this link... Chevron--25% loss Havoline--28% loss Citgo Supergard--29% loss Castrol Syntec--15% loss M-1 Super-Syn=16% loss Royal Purple=17% loss Napa Synthetic=13% loss The above were SL 10w-30's Amsoil 10w-30 syn "AMO-PAO type"--11% loss GC 0w-30--16% loss Kendall 5w-40 synthetic--23% loss Mobil Long Life 0w-30 "Saab"--15% loss Mobil 0w-30 Formula Extreme Trisynthetic--21%loss Mobil 0w-40 Supersyn---16% loss Fina ELF 0w-30 Synthetic--17% loss Torco 5w-30 Synthetic--28% loss Schaffer 10w-30 blend---25% loss Synergyn 3w-30---21% loss BMW HP Synthetic---15% loss Motul 10w-40 E-Tech 100 Syn.--21% loss Saab 5w-30 Syn Blend--24% loss Torco 5w-20 Synthetic--26% loss Synergyn 0w-20 Synthetic--14% loss Auto RX--20% loss Valvoline Synpower Oil Treat.--31% loss Valvoline Maxlife Oil Treat.--29% loss Schaeffer 132 Moly EP Treat.--20% loss I believe the above test was done in the 200* area. Id like to make an informed dicision based on the volatility of a particular oil...it does appear that Amsoil is the leader, but yet conflicts with newer data provided by Terry...or maybe Im just reading his data the wrong way???
 

ShortBuSX

Thread starter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
392
Location
Central Florida
Yeah...thats my point...I cant really find much more. I figured TGA and NOACK were different, but the only difference I saw was the temperature at which its tested 200*(which is around normal opperating temps) and the NOACK being around 400*(?) Im really leaning towards the Amsoil, Id just like to find more current NOACK results, post Katrina would be great...but I aint holding my breath.
 
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
3,844
Guys, I study lots of proprietary lubricant data in the course of my business. The values listed in the bar graph seem very low for all oils tested that I am familiar with. Amsoil has, since its inception been a low volatility oil by design. i.e. they need the oil to be stable and no cook off over longer drains. Both "TGA and NOACK" tests are Thermal Gravimetric Analysis tests. NOACK is designed to measuring the volatility stability of the oil. TGA measure distillation levels at different temps and times. The key methods are ramp up time and temp, max temps, and time at max temp. Keep in mind D5800/NOACK is method of measuring volatility stabililty on the BENCH. ILSAC used to require that 22% max loss limit for pass/fail at 250C for one hour. The oil is heated to 250C and held at that temp for one hour, air is then introduced into the chamber and maintained at a constant flow rate under slight vaccum. After the hour is expired the amount of oil remaining in the chamber is weighed,and compared to the original weight of the oil. The source of the data shared here was Institute of Materials. Their own in house lab is Savant labs and the SAVLAB volume test is based on their protocal. They perform a very respected broad based bench testing protocal for blinded off the shelf motor oils and publish the results. Last time I priced the book it was $10,000 for a regions oil. Asian, US, and Europe are available. So my data was independent of any in house testing that could be construed as biased. The reason the values change is that formulations change, rapidly! For instance in 2000 data for ATM 10w30 was 7.06%. 2004 showed ATM 10w30 at 12.06% Most AFFORDABLE lubricants will test in the 12-15% range by independent lab. Like any measure of a formulation there are tradeoffs. Synthetics may be extremely resistant to volatility (burn off = adding oil) but oxidation resistance is poor. Both contribute to thickening oil and throwing add balance out of whack. Use oil analysis and logging top ups as a accurte way for you to "in-house" test your chosen brand. Don't use one bench test measure to guide your oil purchase decision. The 2005 Amsoil D5800 tests above show me excellent volatility stability that engine sequence testing is causing formulators to ensure. The poorest reading above is a good one in a well maintained car. Some of the relatively good results are not consistant with UOA we see daily! lobo11's test was obviously a bit harder on motor oil but the relative measure of the values is a good one from what I can tell on overview. Additives like Auto-RX will not do as well alone as they do in the host oil at design treat levels. It is designed to be a cleaner not a motor oil! Terry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top