I know the Chevy TPI V-8s had a bridge circuit to run the MAF "burnoff" function, with appropriate relays to run it at each start cycle. I would suspect that other similar systems would need to have something of this nature to maintain efficient fuel curve administration--unless they have other ways of doing that.
Even a "new" and "not-user-oiled" K&N can oil the MAFs on newer vehicles. GM TSBs on that issue too.
I haven't studied the various MAF systems, but considering that K&N filters used to not be an issue in the earlier GM TPI motors, if the burnouff circuit has been deleted or the system is now much more sensitive, perhaps that's the reason that K&Ns are more of an issue with more current model year situations? Perhaps it has something to do with how close the filter is to the MAF and other design issues?
MAF, being an emissions part, would not have any "maintenance requirement" (i.e., cleaning) in a factory service schedule--even if it could be. If it goes "bad", you replace it and maintain emissions compliance. If it goes bad during the warranty period, then the manufacturer would replace it and could request the failed part to be returned to them (QC issues). If it did need to be "serviced", it could lead to other problem issues under warranty. Better, from the factory orientation, to replace and not worry about it.
Just some thoughts,
CBODY67