Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Originally Posted By: D189379
Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Quote:
If you don't pay them, they'll easily find work elsewhere.
Good. Who needs them for a hurting enterprise?
Quote:
Then all you'll be left with is a company not making money, with employees that don't know how or aren't ambitious enough to make money,
This goes on the assumption that the leaving executive is responsible for the former profitability of the company. One of my "hmmm..this appears to happen more often than not" observations is that when a company does great, it's due to the outstanding leadership and keen savvy of the guy at the helm ..and this needs to be rewarded. When business is bad, it's due to market trends and not lack of leadership ..and that avoided loses are the metric of divining and defining outstanding leadership ..and it too must be rewarded.
It appears like the dog gets a bone every time it rolls over.
There are plenty waiting in the wings just hankering for a chance at the slot when the white haired geezer quits.
It's a "take a number for better service" job opportunity.
First off they aren't hurting. It clearly says these guys are profitable. That means they are making the company money. Those are people I would want to stay working for me.
I believe in rewarding competence and encouraging hard work. Maybe you'd sit back and think "Man, I'm sure making alot of money in this division of my company, it must have nothing to do with the people working for me, so I'm going to clean house and replace everyone, because the other divisions of my company are losing money."
I don't really know where you're going with the rest of your ramblings.
What I'm ask is (and I'll state it as simply as possible here) WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT THESE CLOWNS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROFITABILITY? SUPPOSE ANY NUMBER OF "OTHERS", WHO ARE PROBABLY JUST WAITING FOR THESE TYPES TO "GET OUT OF THE WAY", ARE THE REAL DOERS THAT MAKE THESE PLACES PROFITABLE??
..and do it for LESS??
Well let me ask you, what makes you think these guys are clowns and that they aren't responsible for making the money? It doesn't even say who the money is going to other than "key employees". I'm just looking at the facts;
1. Division of company is profitable
2. Company wants to reward "employees" for being part of profitable division.
That's all the information that is there, and that's where my conclusion comes from. Sounds like someones been watching too much of Fox News' economic coverage.