All I know is that when I go to Wal-Mart I see a lot of people with jobs, including senior citizens and people with disabilities. Funny how I don't see the same proportion of workers in other stores. Why don't you try making your argument of how Wal-Mart is bad to the single mom, with 3 kids struggling to make the rent, greeting you at the door next time. Let's see how that goes. Tell her to quit because mom and pop need her money more.
Oh the Walmart in my town is right next to a Lowes, that's next to a Subway, that's next to some small clothing stores, that are next to a Staples, that is across from a Gamestop, that's a few blocks away from a Target, that's next to a Food4Less, etc. and all of these stores always seem to have good clientele. It's a feaking PITA to get into the parking lot without running over some stupid teenager talking on the phone holding a bunch of bags.
well, the mom with the 3 kids is the "mom" i was talking about and the senior citizen is the "pop". they closed their "mom and pop stores" so now they work at walmart.
The difference is your neighborhood "mom & pop" store could only employ a handful of people, and maybe only one or two single moms with 3 kids.
The modern Walmart employs 200+ people, so a lot single moms and senior citizens can have jobs. And its not like the old family store was paying great wages and benefits, or providing career growth opportunities.
ur thinking only one level deep...think of the effect on a more wider scale..think of how products are moved...how distributors and suppliers are affected..how the wholesale market is affected....how it affects manufacturer's prices...walmart and costcos can control all of this when there are no other businesses in the economy etc...also how this affects foreign trade...labor unions....it will also affect wages since there are no other competitors to offer the same salary level...walmart says, "let's just pay that senior citizen $5/hour. we can do that cuz he has no choice but to work here"
etc etc etc
Right. "Cost efficiency" is induced because labor costs via jobs are reduced. By utilizing a proprietary infrastructure to do all required tasks, the number of supporting roles drops.
Now, maybe WM hires Union, I don't know... but what i see around here is the Union laborer drives into wal-mart with a "buy union made" sticker on his non-union built toyota pickup truck, buys a good bunch of made in china junk to save $5, and then drives home, spouting off how bad of a deal he gets, and how America isn't working for him...
Well, the wal-mart effect, and supporting them to save $5 is much of the cause. Sure, they create 200 jobs in one location, and maybe flock 100 more by bringing in neighboring businesses... but they destroyed 400 jobs in the process. Who is going to buy their widgets when all the floors drop out? And, while folks may still go to walmart to buy necessities, the two restaurants that opened up in the shopping center are going to have a far worse fate when folks stop buying things because they don't have work and pay.
The model doesnt work indefinitely.