Chart of popular SL rated dino oils

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
88
Location
FL
I was looking for info on SL rated dino oils and came across this website. I hope it is of use to BITOG members.
cool.gif


http://www.crisdean.net/turbobink/oilspecstable.html

[ June 07, 2004, 06:13 PM: Message edited by: Boeing 757 Pilot ]
 
It says "TBN - Lower # is better (milligrams of KOH needed to neutralize basic constituents in 1 grams of oil) ". Nope. Wrong. IHow much of the other data is wrong?
 
If only is was as simple as this guy lists things.

Sulfated ash is the result of treating some oil with sulfuric acid, incinerating, and other lab treatments of the sample. The constituent components of the ash are more important than the quantity. The main component of the sulfated ash comes from detergents, and those are usually magnesium or calcium compounds. The magnesium ash is abrasive while calcium ash is oil soluble and soft. But, they read-out the same in the lab test.

The zinc content numbers are so close as to be meaningless, and likely within the lab test tolerances.

TBN level of new oil is not a huge clue about much of anything. The TBN level remaining in used oil is a very important factor. A high initial TBN does not necessarily relate to a long-lived TBN.

The viscosity index is calculated on the viscosity changes between 40°C and 100°C, and does not necessarily relate to the viscosity of very cold oil.

In any case, the results of used oil analyses are more significant to picking a good oil than looking at new oil specs.


Ken
 
Question: why are the numbers for the Havoline 5W-30 and Chevron Supreme 5W-30 identical, when posters on here have definitively stated that these are two separate formulas?
 
All these numbers are similar (within a grade). Would be nice to update the table with things which are actually different, like levels of Mo, Ca, shear resistance, oil base (I vs II vs II+), etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom