I now have 32,000 miles on the 2015 3 (2.0L). I dumped the OE fill at 4,000 miles and have used nothing but Mobil 1 EP over the last 28,000 miles. I recently changed over to Edge 5w20 EP. I was going to use Edge EP 0w20, but the Noack was bit on the high side for my liking. (13.2%). I went with the 5w20 Edge EP because the Noack is about (11%).
I personally have never noticed a correlation between Noack and oil consumption. I’ve always found oil consumption depends more on how the car is driven, and what type of low tension rings are being used. My Honda always used oil from day one. Some though have suggested that the lower Noack the better because as time goes on and some of the oil burns off, this eventually leads to ring sticking which causes a spike in oil consumption as the car ages. My 05 Accord did consume more oil as time went on, but I think that had more to do with low tension rings than Noack. I used heavier oils and oils with a lower Noack that never made a difference in oil consumption.
So, being I’m already using Castrol and I like their latest formulations with Ti, I was debating on trying Edge 0w30 (ACEA A3 with a Noack of 8.3%). If you look at the global PDF for the Skyactiv 2.0, this engine can be run on any grade from a 0w20 to a 5w50.
My question is, are there any known issues with using a higher viscosity in this engine other than taking a fuel economy hit? The Edge 0w30 is a better oil, as it meets more demanding specs than the Edge EP. However, it’s also SL (more ZDP), and also has a lower Noack. I tend to drive hard and about 85 mph on the highway. This car does not consume any noticeable oil.
I have to say, I’m impressed with Mazda engines, and there ability to NOT consume any oil. Our 2007 3, 2014 3 and my 2015 3 never burn any oil. Can’t say that about my Honda and Toyotas.
I wish I know the Noack for the Edge EP 10w30. That would be an option.
I personally have never noticed a correlation between Noack and oil consumption. I’ve always found oil consumption depends more on how the car is driven, and what type of low tension rings are being used. My Honda always used oil from day one. Some though have suggested that the lower Noack the better because as time goes on and some of the oil burns off, this eventually leads to ring sticking which causes a spike in oil consumption as the car ages. My 05 Accord did consume more oil as time went on, but I think that had more to do with low tension rings than Noack. I used heavier oils and oils with a lower Noack that never made a difference in oil consumption.
So, being I’m already using Castrol and I like their latest formulations with Ti, I was debating on trying Edge 0w30 (ACEA A3 with a Noack of 8.3%). If you look at the global PDF for the Skyactiv 2.0, this engine can be run on any grade from a 0w20 to a 5w50.
My question is, are there any known issues with using a higher viscosity in this engine other than taking a fuel economy hit? The Edge 0w30 is a better oil, as it meets more demanding specs than the Edge EP. However, it’s also SL (more ZDP), and also has a lower Noack. I tend to drive hard and about 85 mph on the highway. This car does not consume any noticeable oil.
I have to say, I’m impressed with Mazda engines, and there ability to NOT consume any oil. Our 2007 3, 2014 3 and my 2015 3 never burn any oil. Can’t say that about my Honda and Toyotas.
I wish I know the Noack for the Edge EP 10w30. That would be an option.