Camshaft legend adds another two strokes to internal combustion cycle

Messages
2,493
Location
MSP 'burbs, MN
From AutoBlog.com:
quote:
As a hot-rodding legend and inductee into the Drag Racing Hall of Fame, 75-year-old Bruce Crower could have sat back and enjoyed retirement. Not one to let age get in the way of creative thinking, Crower has finally figured out a way to capture some of an internal combustion engine's waste heat - a task he'd been trying to wrap his head around for three decades. A typical four-stroke engine operates on the principle of intake, compression, combustion, and exhaust (or, if you prefer, suck-squeeze-bang-blow). After the conclusion of the exhaust cycle, significant amounts of heat remain in the cylinder. Like many other engineers, Crower ruminated on how best to capture the energy, nstead of rejecting it to the cooling system as waste. Crower's development injects water into the cylinder after the exhaust stroke. With both the intake and exhaust valves closed, the water flashes to steam and adds an additional power stroke to the combustion cycle (this is the "fifth" stroke). Upon venting the steam through the exhaust valve (the "sixth" stroke), the cycle starts over again. There are some apparent advantages and drawbacks to such a system. The obvious advantage is improved efficiency - a claimed 40-percent, made possible by capturing some of that waste heat. In fact, it's claimed that the engine requires no cooling system whatsoever, and Crower's prototype supposedly is only warm to the touch after running for an hour. The cooling effect of the water could also dramatically improve detonation resistance, which would enable significantly increased compression ratios, potentially ending concern over carbon deposits in the combustion chamber. Possible drawbacks include increased emissions, as shooting an air-fuel mixture into a cold cylinder will likely not help increase vaporization of the fuel (this concept might be begging for direct fuel injection). There's also a 33-percent decrease in "real" power cycles, which may result in less average torque at a given engine operating speed. All this injected water has to come from somewhere, which means additional weight and packaging volume (water and gasoline would be consumed at roughly the same rate). Finally, it's fair to question the effect of the injected water on engine life (H2O makes for a poor lubricant) and on catalytic converters. It's far too early in this technology's development process to make a judgment on its effectiveness, but Crower has over a half-century of experience with internal combustion engines, and so we won't place any bets against his success.
 
Messages
873
Location
Shreveport, Louisiana
This sounds really neat. Maybe this is the sort of technologoy we need to take us to the next level of the internal combustion engine. Perhaps smaller cylinder bores with more cylinders in the engine would help some of the issues.
 
Messages
39,805
Location
Pottstown, PA
Hmm ..I think I said that it would be unlikely to have your average soccer mom ..or high anxiety commuter filling up with water and gas at the same time. Maybe I was wrong. [Confused]
 
Messages
8,937
Location
SC
quote:
...(or, if you prefer, suck-squeeze-bang-blow)...
[LOL!] I've never heard the four strokes called that. Gee, someone commented that the "Camry Fuchs Titan" post in the UOA forum sounded like the title of a porn movie. This could be the subtitle. [LOL!] [LOL!] [LOL!]
 
Messages
2,435
Location
Mizzou-land
427z06 wrote: "Yep. I'm not touching this one with a ten-foot pole." I think you may not be doing right.. at least this didn't degenerate into a thick vs thin lube discussion.
 
Top