Yeah they were used in a lot of stuff, I just didn't want to ramble for too long.Oldsmobile engines even found their way into many of the later / last Pontiac FireBirds and TransAms.... I was just looking at a mint condition "Olds/Turbo/Trans Am that was pulled from storage and cleaned up, painted and put up for auction with only 20,000 miles.
Sad thing is even with an Olds (tough as nails V8) and a Turbo at that , those engines were de-tuned down so much the output for that car is less than 200bhp. SAD.... Nice, sweet car though.
My friend has a 79 Cadillac Seville (and a 77 for parts) both with 350 Oldsmobiles that came with multi point fuel injection.
I also had an 87 caprice 4 door years ago that came with a 307 Oldsmobile from factory. Usually it was the 87-90 wagons that all came with it but in 87 in Canada most of the 4 doors did too.
I think that's just a perfect example of how they are so close to each other that how you optioned it out had more to do with it than whether you got an Oldsmobile or Buick.The reason I thought Oldsmobile was higher than Cadillac is my experiences with a 1993 Olds Ninety Eight with leather seats that my parents owned, and my 1997 Buick Park Ave base model which has leather seats from an Ultra, and a 2002 Ultra that I test drove. Also a 1970s Cadillac Eldorado my dad owned.
The 93 Olds Ninety Eighty had the most comfortable seats for me. The Olds Ninety Eight seats were more padded than Buick Ultra seats, and fit me better than Cadillac seats. Olds Ninety Eight seats were a slice of heaven.
That 1993 Olds Ninety Eight had the best combination of comfort and handling. It had a more comfortable ride than Park Ave and better handling than Cadillac Eldo.
I like both Olds Ninety Eight and Buick Park Ave a lot, but I'd rather have Olds for comfort due to cushier seats, softer ride, more headroom (due to windshield having less slope) and maybe slightly more trunk room.
There's no denying that the Olds Ninety Eight looks old school fancy, but also more dated by older styling. The Buick Park Ave looks (and is) my more sleek and aerodynamic. Park Ave is more sporty.
I care about comfort the most. I wanted a 1990s Olds Ninety Eight with low miles, but couldn't find one. So I bought a 1997 Buick Park Ave with (at the time) 50K miles on it. I've learned to love my Park Ave, but I always wanted the Ninety Eight.
I always thought Olds was higher than Buick because for me the 1990s Olds Ninety Eight were the most comfortable cars I've ever ridden in. Also, I assumed old people liked Olds Ninety Eight because it's very comfortable and just below Cadillac.
I was shocked to learn Buick is higher than Olds. But really, it's just supposed to be higher according to GM. According to the public is what matters most.
Park Ave Ultra is beloved by people wanting a sporty luxury car. Olds Ninety Eight is beloved by people wanting maximum comfort who don't care about power (usually no super charger) and those people probably don't want a supercharger. That describes most old folks who have some money. I'm only 56, but I like the same things that old folks did/do.
It's shame that USA luxury sedans died out. They're comfy, practical (way better mpg than SUVs), and some are sporty. They also have better high speed handling and stability than SUVs.
And that's into the era where they were all basically Buick engines (the 3800). Either one of those is a good car if you find a nice example of one. Buy one that's been taken care of and rust free.