correct me if im wrong, but isnt it hard to benchmark air flow....?
If you compared a paper filter and K&N, with a low pressure intake, say at idle, or up to 2500rpm on a engine, wouldnt the restrictions match?
But, if you take the car to 7000rpm (lets say this is an SER V-Spec for the sake of high redline) wouldnt the paper start to become restrictive, and the K&N maintain its previous restrcition to a closer degree?
What i mean is, there has to be a bottleneck point for paper filters, so without testing the air flow in many different air pressure levels, how can you get an accurate test?
If you compared a paper filter and K&N, with a low pressure intake, say at idle, or up to 2500rpm on a engine, wouldnt the restrictions match?
But, if you take the car to 7000rpm (lets say this is an SER V-Spec for the sake of high redline) wouldnt the paper start to become restrictive, and the K&N maintain its previous restrcition to a closer degree?
What i mean is, there has to be a bottleneck point for paper filters, so without testing the air flow in many different air pressure levels, how can you get an accurate test?