Again, your plain English said, "If they were the same, they wouldn't have 2 different brands for it." That could not be more clear. It says that things that are the same do not have different brands. This is false, but you offered it as evidence they are not the same.
They are, in fact, not the same, as I've stated. But the reasoning you offered is not evidence for it, because that reasoning is faulty. There is evidence that they are different, but your originally stated reason is not part of that evidence.
You clearly understand this and are trying to obfuscate the issue. If you want to pretend you didn't say it, or pretend the words don't mean what they mean, I can't make you be honest. But nobody's fooled.
Unless, of course, this is all an elaborate troll, in which case, congratulations, you got me.