I thought that too, but I wasn’t about to tell them.Why would one want to when there are much better choices available.
Known by who ? I can’t run Delvac 1 5w40 as long as Delvac 1300 15w40 ?It has long been known that synthetic oil does not hold up well when contamination reaches a certain level. In a diesel I reckon that contamination level would be reached in about 10 minutes, at which point the oil is degrading. Regular oil holds up better to contamination. Oil guys will sell you anything to make a buck.
I thought everybody knows synthetic cannot take fuel contamination.... Same reason people running most carbs avoid synthetic like the plague. Great stuff for a clean burning FI car or truck.Known by who ? I can’t run Delvac 1 5w40 as long as Delvac 1300 15w40 ?
It has long been known that synthetic oil does not hold up well when contamination reaches a certain level. In a diesel I reckon that contamination level would be reached in about 10 minutes, at which point the oil is degrading. Regular oil holds up better to contamination. Oil guys will sell you anything to make a buck.
Are these the same folks that believe Lucas Oil Stabilizer has a valid purpose in a healthy engine?I thought everybody knows synthetic cannot take fuel contamination....
There were also some tug boat operations (Cummins) that greatly extended hours with Delvac 1What?
Whether the oil is synthetic or not has nothing to do with its contaminating holding capacity. That's a function of the additive package and why oils can be blended for extended drain intervals.
Conventional bases are more prone to degradation due to oxidation, and thus the creation of deposits when that occurs, which is why they are not used for extended drain oils.
There are numerous examples of OTR diesel engines running incredible mileage on synthetic lubes at extended intervals. Member Doug Hillary ran a fleet test of OTR truck trains through the Australian outback testing Delvac 1 for ExxonMobil with ~100,000km drain intervals. A 1.2 million km random tear-down showed parts that were in "as new" condition and were thus returned to service. I believe the test ended at over 2.4 million Km.
New to the forum, but thanks for the friendly welcome. I find it hard to believe anybody on this site thinks diesels benefit from magical oil.What was your previous username, idahopotato?
He already has 19 posts...onto something!With that attitude I suspect you aren't going to last too long around here.
Are you legitimately claiming you can't see the correlation between vapid claims about intolerance to fuel dilution peddled by a single newcomer with 15 posts, not backed up by actual data but sarcasm and feigned misbelief and the religious fervour that surrounds LOS by its advocates despite a complete absence of proof?
Trying to undermine the legitimacy of this comparison by characterizing it as schizophrenia clearly betrays your true intentions here, which is obviously nothing more than trolling.
Sounds like you could use somebody around to disagree with the status quo from time to time, and point out obvious facts of tribology such as that synthetic oil does not hold up well to fuel contamination.
Blingo, what does you chart have to do with fuel contamination?Well, Potato, while some often like to be just funny some also may love the fact that soot makes for higher MOFT or be right in that you don't seem to quantify much of conventionals' advantage – like fourteen minutes vs. the ten of synthetics (all synthetics?) or so.
View attachment 35384
act like a child