Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Originally Posted By: Ddub
My main goals would be shorter stopping distances and incresed brake feel without any significant decreased pad life, or increased noise or brake dust.
Well, yeah. Those do tend to be the goals, don't they?
Aftermarket brake pads are only worthwhile when they address a specific limitation -- AND if you're willing to put up with a huge sacrifice or two. There is no free lunch. Longer-lived pads will have worse stopping power and/or chew up rotors, better stopping power usually comes with more dust, better cold bite usually comes with worse heat resistance, etc. -- and if you want a pad that does everything well, prepare to pay through the nose for only slight benefits in each category.
In general, when it comes to cars made by companies that generally know what they're doing (e.g. Mazda), I strongly recommend sticking with OE unless you drive hard enough to need a sportier pad.
As for the supposedly longer-lasting pads with "lifetime" warranties... I would never EVER trust a pad designed with long life (or low dust or noise for that matter) as the main priority unless I could be
absolutely certain that they would still have enough power to overwhelm the tires at most speeds.
Long story short, OE is probably your best bet.
Excellent info. As I have said a bunch, brake pads come in a million flavors, just like ice cream. We do several brake jobs every year here with our fleet and have learned the hard way that it is very hard to beat the factory pads for overall performance.
I especially agree that NO low dust formula is as good at actually stopping your car as a good semi metallic blend like most OE.