Angry Survivors Blame "Green Policy" for Au Fires

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
9,103
Location
MN
ANGRY residents last night accused local authorities of contributing to the bushfire toll by failing to let residents chop down trees and clear up bushland that posed a fire risk.

During question time at a packed community meeting in Arthurs Creek on Melbourne's northern fringe, Warwick Spooner — whose mother Marilyn and brother Damien perished along with their home in the Strathewen blaze — criticised the Nillumbik council for the limitations it placed on residents wanting the council's help or permission to clean up around their properties in preparation for the bushfire season. "We've lost two people in my family because you *****eads won't cut trees down," he said.

"We wanted trees cut down on the side of the road … and you can't even cut the grass for God's sake."

Later, the meeting was cut short when Mr Spooner's father, Dennis, collapsed in his chair and an ambulance had to be called. Despite losing his wife and son and everything he owned, a friend later said he had not stopped or slept since the weekend.

Another resident said she had asked the council four times to tend to out-of-control growth on public land near her home, but her pleas had been ignored.

There was widespread applause when Nillumbik Mayor Bo Bendtsen said changes were likely to be made about the council's policy surrounding native vegetation.

But his response was not good enough for Mr Spooner: "It's too late now mate. We've lost families, we've lost people."

More than 500 people spilled out of the small hall during the meeting, at which the CFA, Victoria Police, Department of Human Services and Telstra provided updates.

Many expressed anger that police road blocks were stopping them from reaching survivors trapped in fire-ravaged areas with no water, power or other basic needs. One man present spoke of counselling a woman whose two children had been killed and whose grief had been compounded by not knowing where they were because the area had been declared a crime scene and she had not been allowed to return.

Most of those present were tired, grieving the loss of relatives and friends and with little more than the smoke-coated clothes on their backs. Some were still showing symptoms of shock after experiencing the worst natural disaster in the nation's history.

Scattered around the hall and outside were trestle tables with clothing sorted in neat piles, toiletries, food and bottled water. On the floor were dozens of pairs of shoes. There was also a section dedicated to baby clothes and another for children's toys.

Of all the speakers who addressed the meeting, it was Arthurs Creek CFA Captain David McGahy who got the most rousing reception.

Choking back tears he told them: "I'm so terribly sorry. We desperately wanted to protect you but we couldn't.

"In the cold analysis of light, it wouldn't have mattered if we'd have had 200 units here, all that would have happened is we would have ended up with a whole lot of dead firefighters. I've been at this game for about 40 years and I haven't experienced anything like that, not even remotely like it."


http://www.theage.com.au/national/angry-survivors-blame-council-green-policy-20090211-83p0.html
 
We have the same arguments in Calif. all the time. There is a danger zone with the amount of fuel available between untouched forest and managed forest that makes the fires worse. Add too many people moving into moving into wooded areas and you have sad situations like AU is going through.
 
I like to advise people in Toronto to apply to cut down all their trees, with a stipulation that if the request is refused, the city is accepting all liability for any damage done by their trees.
 
Alternately, a lot of those houses (just like up here in the Blue Mountains) are built right up to the treeline because the owner wants them there.

Talking to our local rural fire "chief", there are increasing quantities of new houses going up that they are ordering their troop not to defend, as they are built with no buffer.

He went on to explain that the nature of fire in Oz is that there is debris that falls on the ground, and builts up.

After 10 (average) years, the debris is composting at the bottom at around the same rate as it's falling, and is a "typical" Oz fast burning fire that doesn't usually crown.

Last few years of drought, and the ground litter has dried out, and is not composting, meaning that the layer is increasing in depth, and bone dry. The suffering trees are dropping more twigs and branches, further adding to the litter layer.

Locally, the regular fires used to be about 4-6 feet high, and wouldn't crown. Last weekend, he was fighting them 12 feet high, and on the verge of crowning. They are more intense, and hanf around longer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top