Amsoil SS vs PU 5w30

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
401
Location
U.S.A
How does AM SS compare to PU when it comes down to cleaning ability? I know PU has a strong detergent add pack but how does AM SS compare. Run with Ea filters and change every 10k or one year. 2002 Celica 1zz with 66k. Only drive about 6k a year.
 
PU is designed for cleaning. Amsoil SS line of oils are designed for extended use. Two different blends if you ask me. Both are top of the line and should keep your engine spotless if proper OCIs are followed.
 
PU is group 3 load with a lot clean components. Amsoil is group 4 designed for extend OCI. Both are excellent. I would rotate them at 10K OCI. If UOA tells you they are still good, do the 15K OCI.
 
Pretty good advice, IMHO. In CA you are not really dealing with terrible cold and only 6K per year is not going to stretch either one. One year is probably too soon, I'd go by miles. Either go PU for 10K and possibly do a UOA or the AMSOIL for 10K and just call it good. Both should perform excellently. Cheers!
 
Thanks for the good input. I usually change it out every year. I live on a Navy base and its only a 6 mile round trip to and from work.
 
Originally Posted By: Artem
PU is designed for cleaning. Amsoil SS line of oils are designed for extended use. Two different blends if you ask me. Both are top of the line and should keep your engine spotless if proper OCIs are followed.
Agreed. I don't know if I'd say it's designed for cleaning, but it certainly does keep an engine clean. I respect the fact they used the Seq IIIG to demonstrate that fact too.
 
^Both should clean about the same. Pennzoil's Ultra is 'marketed' more for cleaning. Amsoil's SS lineup is 'marketed' more for extended drains. Toss a coin, Ultra SN looks great on paper compared to Amsoil, but you may wind up with differing end of run TBN relative to the differing basestock(is Ultra GTL or turned to uber slack/wax III+? etc, they have specs for SN that look awesome but only have 'advertised' the SM rating so far AFAIK). Get a UOA to see how TBN/oil/engine health is after say...9 months, to see how well things look before settling on 1 full year with those short trips. 3 miles one way, 6 round-trip is relatively short tripping. Severe driving, not quite extreme. How cold does it get where the vehicle is driven? How long(weeks, months of the year at the 'coldest' temps?) Does the vehicle idle for long periods of time(10+ minutes), with A/C on frequently, on the same trips/often on most trips(this would be during the summer)? This can lead to fuel dilution and shear the oil somewhat, depending on how 'hard' your engine is on oil. Have you gotten a UOA performed on a sample from this engine before? Confirm it's relative health now or 6 months in on oil of choice, keep driving until you get the results and then get a more accurate idea of how long either 'could' go in your app.
 
Last edited:
Amsoil uses a lot of calcium (3,600ppm) which will help keep an engine clean over long intervals.
 
^Yeah, similar metallic-add packages between the two. It really comes down to base stock, which is up in the air but don't want to go there. smile
 
I don't know if the SN PU has changed or not. I still can't believe they haven't updated their PDS's. It's kinda ridiculous at this point...although few probably ever notice.
 
Originally Posted By: buster
I don't know if the SN PU has changed or not. I still can't believe they haven't updated their PDS's. It's kinda ridiculous at this point...although few probably ever notice.
Yeah, it's crazy. You can read their SN on their data base with the relative info, but product info from the sales page shows SM pds instead. crzy Not sure how to read the kind of .pdf to decipher just posted above, going to try though.(newbie). smile
 
Amsoil is likely the better product, as traditionally they have used only the highest quality base stocks in their Signature Series oils. I doubt Shell will be using a top-quality base oil in a mass-market oil such as Pennzoil Ultra. Whether or not it makes a difference though, is an entirely different discussion.
 
Quote:
Amsoil is likely the better product, as traditionally they have used only the highest quality base stocks in their Signature Series oils.
Can you prove that?
Quote:
I doubt Shell will be using a top-quality base oil in a mass-market oil such as Pennzoil Ultra
Maybe Shell is recognizing the increased demand for synthetics and is now offering a premium oil. wink
 
For example: What if oil A is using a Group III+, with a POE and really good additives/detergents vs Oil B that is using a full PAO with a diester and good, but older additives?
 
^So what? Older additives do not mean bad additives. grin2 Addition 'formulation' older? Yeah, debatable on what's 'better' or 'worse' when SN has only been out for like the life of a 3 month old baby. We just don't know what this child will be like yet! lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top