dnewton3
Staff member
Honestly, given the extreme use of the vehicle and fuels used, I think this UOA is very, very good. Admittedly 2.2k miles isn't a long OCI, but the Fe is only 5ppm; that's a hair over 2ppm/1k miles. That's not a bad wear rate by any means, and given the short OCI and usage, I think this is excellent wear. The other metals are really low. There's no contamination.
Why are you all recommending thicker lubes when this one did a great job? Once again, I make the general observation that you all focus too much on what's in the bottle and not what matters. Lubricants are about wear control. The wear in this UOA shows everything is very good, and given the nature of the car's experiences, it's darn good.
Thicker lubes might survive a bit longer in use in this extreme application ... OK - but this is a race car, and thicker lubes also comsume more power. Power is everything in a race car. So why run a thicker lube and lose power when the current lube is doing great? Honestly I think some of you like to make recommendations just to be different, and ignore what the data and application are telling you.
03marin - Rather than switching lube brands or grades, why not run the same lube out on your next OCI out to 3k miles? See how that plays out. Then maybe 4k miles? Let the data tell you when to OCI. The wear rates are well within a normal range, and given how hard you're working the engine, this is outstanding performance from the lube you're using.
Singular UOAs aren't able to tell you which oil is "better" than another. But what you can discern from this UOA is that wear is admirable, especially given the service factor consideration.
Why are you all recommending thicker lubes when this one did a great job? Once again, I make the general observation that you all focus too much on what's in the bottle and not what matters. Lubricants are about wear control. The wear in this UOA shows everything is very good, and given the nature of the car's experiences, it's darn good.
Thicker lubes might survive a bit longer in use in this extreme application ... OK - but this is a race car, and thicker lubes also comsume more power. Power is everything in a race car. So why run a thicker lube and lose power when the current lube is doing great? Honestly I think some of you like to make recommendations just to be different, and ignore what the data and application are telling you.
03marin - Rather than switching lube brands or grades, why not run the same lube out on your next OCI out to 3k miles? See how that plays out. Then maybe 4k miles? Let the data tell you when to OCI. The wear rates are well within a normal range, and given how hard you're working the engine, this is outstanding performance from the lube you're using.
Singular UOAs aren't able to tell you which oil is "better" than another. But what you can discern from this UOA is that wear is admirable, especially given the service factor consideration.