Originally Posted By: msparks
Originally Posted By: sciphi
Forget this. Let's just give the money straight to the Swiss.
I think they gave the swiss something like 15 Billion. Been there done that.
I was listen to Beck today, and he listed how many billions that AIG paid out to foreign countries. That is what should be reported.
Quote:
American International Group (AIG: 1.36, 0.41, 43.16%) disclosed that it used more than $120 billion in government assistance last year to settle insurance contracts with Goldman Sachs (GS: 105.221, 6.2862, 6.35%) and other financial institutions, including foreign banks, as well as to municipal governments in many states.
Goldman Sachs is the largest counterparty recipient, though not by much, with various payments totaling $12.9 billion. The French financial services company Societe Generale received $11.9 billion, Germany's Deutsche Bank $11.8 billion, Britain's Barclays (BCS: 6.18, 0.88, 16.6%) with $8.5 billion, Merrill Lynch (BAC: 7.62, 1.39, 22.31%) with $6.8 billion and Bank of America $5.2 billion.
Switzerland's UBS received $5 billion, and $4.9 billion went to France's BNP Paribas.
These are all payments made after Sept. 16, when the federal government seized control of AIG with an $85 billion loan. The company did not include any counterparty payments beyond Dec. 31.
The company paid these companies in recent months to settle prearranged contracts. AIG covered those companies against losses on mortgage-backed securities insured with credit default swaps.
AIG still has $1.6 trillion in credit default swaps left to settle.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/economy/aig-reveals-used-taxpayer-money/
So we should honor the contracts with the foreign banks for ten do billions but we should break valid contracts for individuals that fulfilled their side of the bargain?
This is very dangerous stuff the government is proposing. Including violating ex post facto restrictions in the Constitution. Of course that is no longer worth the paper it was written on....
The payment structure has been known for at least one year (prior to the government take over), and there IS a federal law specifically stating that these contracts are valid. Is the government now reneging on it's own word? Sure seems that way.