OK, that made me laugh!Porsche model years to avoid are 1948–2023.
Was it not that 2005-2008 911 range cars, at least, had a better IMS bearing design? This made its way to some Boxsters and Caymans in 2005... but all of 'em had it by 2006? Then, ALL P-cars (sports cars) had the new design that was not problematic with year 2009+??The original bearings were sealed and 'lubed for life', and there were several different designs. Most of the upgrade replacement IMS bearings are now splash lubed and are very long lived so far, although some of the manufacturers recommend regular replacement albeit at relatively long intervals. Agree that it is way overblown. That said, we replaced the IMS's on ours (w/ the splash lubed, ceramic roller LN) and I now have two perfectly good OEM bearings on my garage shelf.
The M97 just had a larger bearing.Was it not that 2005-2008 911 range cars, at least, had a better IMS bearing design? This made its way to some Boxsters and Caymans in 2005... but all of 'em had it by 2006? Then, ALL P-cars (sports cars) had the new design that was not problematic with year 2009+??
They're all great driving cars, even the big fatty Cayenne and PanameraSpeaking of P-Cars, the current model year non-S Cayman, "Targa", turbo-4, apparently is a great car, with all the go-fast goodies. No great engine sound... but a great-driving car (particularly in 6mt, my fav.)
you mentioned cayman/boxster soi responded to that. Boxster with flat 6. It can be a beech if you don’t have a good clamp remover and wobble extensions to work in dark tight places LOL. Arms and hands all scratched up worst part. But next time will be much easier because my hands know where to go in what order.You did your AOS in which car?
You did your AOS in which car?
Because it was an absolute bear of a job on my 996.
..and I believe the original dual row bearing ('98-'01 or so) has the lowest failure rate of all but that should rise as the cars age. Us? We replaced the IMS w/ the open LN bearing (dual row in both cars) w/ a recommended replacement of 75K mi/6 yrs. Given that our cars see maybe 2K/yr I am considering this effectively a lifetime fix (w/ regular oil changes, checking the filter pleats).Was it not that 2005-2008 911 range cars, at least, had a better IMS bearing design? This made its way to some Boxsters and Caymans in 2005... but all of 'em had it by 2006? Then, ALL P-cars (sports cars) had the new design that was not problematic with year 2009+??
They installed larger IMS bearing to handle the load, which clearly indicates ims failure was not due to lubrication issues but inadequate load capacity. Failures went way downWas it not that 2005-2008 911 range cars, at least, had a better IMS bearing design? This made its way to some Boxsters and Caymans in 2005... but all of 'em had it by 2006? Then, ALL P-cars (sports cars) had the new design that was not problematic with year 2009+??
Beats anything VokesFoggen makes... some CVTs are indeed exhilarating though!OP wants Porsche, people recommend Mustang. It is just matter of time before someone comes and says: My Honda Accord CVT is pretty fun to drive.
Only thing it beats is my GE refrigerator.Beats anything VokesFoggen makes... some CVTs are indeed exhilarating though!
some CVTs are indeed exhilarating though!
This one sure was! Left me stranded.
That was a Subaru Crosstrek. 2400 miles. The knocking is the CVT belt.What kind of car was this Cujet? Is that engine knocking?
I've always wanted to buy a base Boxster and go down the vintage path; silver with a red interior and do the 'Boxster' badge in gold (like the early 356), find a more vintage looking alloy wheel or get a white one and apply the low stripe with the PORSCHE or Boxster in the Carrera script and Fuchs 'Hot Wheels'.....That was a Subaru Crosstrek. 2400 miles. The knocking is the CVT belt.
Saw this today, I was "in love"! The driver took off and the car really sounded great.
![]()
Sweet!That was a Subaru Crosstrek. 2400 miles. The knocking is the CVT belt.
Saw this today, I was "in love"! The driver took off and the car really sounded great.
![]()