There is a hot debate going on in another thread about whether or not Amsoil products (except the XL line) contain any group III base oil. Seems like this debate has raged, albeit usually involving Mobil 1, for years here on BITOG.
1) Is it safe to assume that a large oil company can take a competitor's product and perform extensive, and needless to say expensive, testing to determine all of the competing product's ingredients?
2) Is it safe to assume that testing could also determine the precise quantity of each ingredient in the competing product?
If the answer to both of the above questions is "Yes" then I see no benefit that a company would derive from concealing the type or mix of base oils of from the consumer.
After all, Joe Consumer is not going to say "Ah ha! I can combine 65% Group IV with 33% Group III, then top off the last 2% of this mix with a few additives and not have to buy Brand "X" oil anymore".
My inclination is to think that the answer to the above questions must be "No" otherwise generic versions of various name brand oils would be available everywhere. I am not a chemist, however, and do not know what tests are available when the cost to perform testing is not a concern.
In the final analysis, I am happy using Amsoil and the UOA's speak for the quality of their ingredients and formulas. I have also been happy using Mobil 1 and Pennzoil Platinum. None of these oils have let me down yet, nor do I think that they will in the future.
Try calling Coca-Cola and ask what their secret formula is. Better yet, call KFC and see if they would be willing to share the Colonel's secret mix of "herbs and spices" with you. In the end, who cares as long as Coca-Cola and KFC taste good. I'm being facetious of course, so please don't get offended.
1) Is it safe to assume that a large oil company can take a competitor's product and perform extensive, and needless to say expensive, testing to determine all of the competing product's ingredients?
2) Is it safe to assume that testing could also determine the precise quantity of each ingredient in the competing product?
If the answer to both of the above questions is "Yes" then I see no benefit that a company would derive from concealing the type or mix of base oils of from the consumer.
After all, Joe Consumer is not going to say "Ah ha! I can combine 65% Group IV with 33% Group III, then top off the last 2% of this mix with a few additives and not have to buy Brand "X" oil anymore".
My inclination is to think that the answer to the above questions must be "No" otherwise generic versions of various name brand oils would be available everywhere. I am not a chemist, however, and do not know what tests are available when the cost to perform testing is not a concern.
In the final analysis, I am happy using Amsoil and the UOA's speak for the quality of their ingredients and formulas. I have also been happy using Mobil 1 and Pennzoil Platinum. None of these oils have let me down yet, nor do I think that they will in the future.
Try calling Coca-Cola and ask what their secret formula is. Better yet, call KFC and see if they would be willing to share the Colonel's secret mix of "herbs and spices" with you. In the end, who cares as long as Coca-Cola and KFC taste good. I'm being facetious of course, so please don't get offended.