Would be a different story of any of us accidentally shot someone.
This is almost a sure thing.Would be a different story of any of us accidentally shot someone.
And in playing a role in a gunfight - P75 that AB would missGood point, but then how was it a cinematographer who got hit and not another actor?
Sounds like an issue under civil rather than criminal law.I'm probably mistaken but I thought Baldwin was responsible as executive producer. That includes hiring (whether directly or indirectly) the armorer. That is what I thought the case was about. Someone died over it is the sad part.
There is a lot of that going on w/r to this IMHO. If this was someone with a different political lean, many would have a different opinion I surmise.as much as I dislike Alec Baldwin
All day every day in industrial safety. I'm in the mining industry, a competent person checks a lot of things on site that I have to trust without verifying more than more simple safety checks that I am qualified/allowed to perform; with that said, if I think something isn't safe I a more than within my rights to say "no I'm not doing xyz until it's fixed. It's why management/foremans can be held personally responsible in mining accidents/deaths of individuals even when they themselves played a role in their own accident.Exactly, I at times have to check out a fall protection harness that's inspected by Party A and hook it to a D-ring that was checked by a "competent person." I'm responsible for proper fit but beyond that I have to trust my life to a couple people I haven't even met.
Precisely (live round comment) - having those on set and using the firearm in question for shooting live rounds as I understand it was gross negligence by the armorer. On AB, I have no comment b/c his political beliefs etc. aren't part of this/no cares to the core issue where of who is to blame, the case, etc.I agree with this but people are also prosecuted for the accidents. I will never understand why there were live rounds on the set and I will also never understand Hollywood.
It was nice to not have to hear his opinion on things for the last year while he was on trial. Hopefully that continues, but I doubt it. It is just so ironic that the person that claimed to be an expert on what guns you or I should be allowed to have and how dangerous they are ends up killing someone by accident or negligence
So you're saying that the judge wouldn't protect your rights and also dismiss the case over prosecutor shenanigans?Would be a different story of any of us accidentally shot someone.
You would do your cursory visual and fit checks but after that, if it fails and you followed all procedures, the blame would go to the CP/manufacturer/management, not the end user. That's how the mining industry works/MSHA sees it.Exactly, I at times have to check out a fall protection harness that's inspected by Party A and hook it to a D-ring that was checked by a "competent person." I'm responsible for proper fit but beyond that I have to trust my life to a couple people I haven't even met.
I foresee an OJ Simpson situation where he skated on the criminal charges, but follow-up civil suite pretty much bankrupted him. (The only reason the juice didn't end up in the poor house and the reason he moved to Florida was because there was a % limit his NFL Pension could be garnished and he lived off that).Not on purpose
But severe negligence can be punishable
Yes agree stinks and prosecutors lame
Maybe, but we would, as gun owners have all our guns gone and been in the hoosegow this entire - what 3+ years???So you're saying that the judge wouldn't protect your rights and also dismiss the case over prosecutor shenanigans?
Yes, 43 fatalities due to unnatural cause of death on sets since 1990, with very few gun-related ones among those.Ah ok 43 fatalities on movie sets since 1990....those are all fatalities not just gun related. Very few of those are gun related (2-3?).
Exactly what I am saying. Any of us would have the book thrown at us as we are not part of the elite.So you're saying that the judge wouldn't protect your rights and also dismiss the case over prosecutor shenanigans?
That was the point.Not really justice for loved ones of….victims
Not on purpose
But severe negligence can be punishable
Yes agree stinks and prosecutors lame
In California you'd be taken in custody and likely jailed, at least temporarily, for shooting someone who broke into your home and walked into your bedroom at 2:30AM.Would be a different story of any of us accidentally shot someone.
Keep in mind this is a known hot head - That generally translates to impatient, stubborn, and not approachable - so, not sure he’d even had accepted training in advance …
Yep, just finished a 15:20 flight and did not sleep well. Even with a huge selection - it was hard to find movies that were not “action packed” with physical fighting, extreme stunts, guns by the dozens, other weapons, and some gawd awful driving/stunts …Yes, 43 fatalities due to unnatural cause of death on sets since 1990, with very few gun-related ones among those.
You forgot "elitist".Keep in mind this is a known hot head - That generally translates to impatient, stubborn, and not approachable - so, not sure he’d even had accepted training in advance …