if your engine is running fine and no oil is disapearing, why pay the extra expense? IMO its mainly a band-aid for poorly maintained engines that got cheapo service early in life. That said, it is useful in some applications because it is a tad thicker (some engines like a bit thicker oil), and has syn components sometimes. I dont necessarily like the seal sweller components though, if your seals arent leaky.
For example, my father's toyota had dino oil for the first 150k. Nothing special, no HM stuff, etc. Didnt use or leak any. Why go to HM oil if it isnt necessary? We actually went over to M1 and havent looked back since (currently at 185k).
My GF's acura integra has had unknown changes through its life (she bought it used at 140k and it now has 161k). Something was done right, it doesnt use any oil or leak any oil. Why should we use HM oil? It wont do much, and so she has been using GTX since. We may change it to M1 because its a bit thinner, has moly, and can let her extend her intervals.
If your engine leaks, burns oil, etc., HM oil may be a good choice. But you dont seem to have these issues, so sqve your $$$ or go to synthetic, and save your money by extending intervals (based upon analysis, of course).
JMH