I think he posted it because he does have a voa for each of those oils in the video. Of course the rest of it is entertainment lolNo, that's not of interest unless you are looking for entertainment only.
I think he posted it because he does have a voa for each of those oils in the video. Of course the rest of it is entertainment lolNo, that's not of interest unless you are looking for entertainment only.
I don't see how a material count and viscosity test are related. However, I was having a comparable thought this morning, what if something was switched, is it my sample, etc, etc, etc. I emailed again.Correct me if I’m being paranoid, but if Blackstone screws up the first sample with viscosity...retests, results change in the one category of concern, but doesn’t change one single part per million in any other category...does that raise a red flag? Did they really retest or just fill in the viscosity segment with a different number?
I’m asking because I don’t know and I’m skeptical. Because in my mind - and I could be 100% wrong - there would be some sort of minor variations in copper and aluminum in ppm’s, no? Or do they just retest and test only for viscosity?
After thinking about it more, is there a possibility that samples or data was mixed? Or something comparable? This was a pretty big change in the test result and it raises some concerns in my mind about the entire report.
I'm sure we're running low on sample at this point, but is there any left?
yep, it is quite a difference. Now I have some doubts about how much both reports are trustworthy.jesus, that's a 2 point swing, how the crap
One interesting thing I saw there, PP TBN is 5.2. I have never seen such low TBN in PP, usually around 7. Is it another miss by BS?No, that's not of interest unless you are looking for entertainment only.
Yup, and it isn't the first time unfortunately.yep, it is quite a difference. Now I have some doubts about how much both reports are trustworthy.
I appreciate your concern and looked into it, but found no reason to suspect the other data is inaccurate. Each test is run separately and nothing about the other data for your sample or others tested around the same time suggests a mix up. I put in a request for a third viscosity reading which I will pass along if there is enough sample left. Note that neither viscosity reading indicated a problem with the oil and the results overall were also favorable. If anything in the results had suggested a real problem, we would have stated that plainly in the comments and if bad enough, our policy is to give you a call before sending out the report. I do not believe there is any cause to be concerned about the health of your Ram's engine.
We were able to test the viscosity a third time and it was consistent with the second reading. I am confident that the oil's viscosity met 5W/20 specifications.
Ok, we’ll that answers my question. Each test is independent of each other. That makes sense to why nothing else changed in your updated test.Response received
One interesting thing I saw there, PP TBN is 5.2. I have never seen such low TBN in PP, usually around 7. Is it another miss by BS?
PS: more like a rhetorical question
If Hemi's sit for a while, even new ones, they tick loudly for 30 - 60 seconds until oil has been well circulated.
Seems to be worse in the winter.
I've heard 100s do this.
"Its a hemi thing"
For some background, I work at a large Ram dealer.I hear this and have read of it for years. I guess I'm lucky that my hemi basically never ticks aside from the rare occasion under the specific circumstances I listed above. I listen on every startup (just a weird habit of mine). None of the later model Ram 1500 and 2500 owners I know of have ticking issues either.
My pentastar powered 2017 Ram 1500 had more of a sewing machine sound to it on cold start.
I also cut open every used oil filter to examine for metal bits.