The spec is 17FE+, Ow20. The owner's manual also lists an alternate of 0w30. This Euro LX doesn't have the BMW LL04, which I wish it did. Instead, it has Porsche C30, VW 504/507, Mercedes 229.31/229.51/229.52. It's an API SN (wish it was an SN+ or SP for LSPI) and ACEA C2/C3, so, I'm betting it's robust enough to survive 5000 mile OCI's and as long as I have no LSPI events (I don't hear/feel any rumbling at low RPMs), and change it out at 5000 miles, it should provide fine service. If not, I'll be hit with an expensive rebuild!And what exact spec does it require. I though it was their ll-14 or 17 nowadays which is a 20 grade or no? But at any rate I'm pretty sure other markets spec ll-01 or ll-04 for the same engine. the FE oils are more for fuel economy.
I think you'll be just fine. Pennzoil platinum euro L has the ll-04 spec and can be had at any Walmart for $25 shipped and so can PP euro 0w-40 which doesn't have any bmw spec but looks pretty lspi friendly judging from the voa. But i doubt even the latest revision of ll-01 would be bad either.The spec is 17FE+, Ow20. The owner's manual also lists an alternate of 0w30. This Euro LX doesn't have the BMW LL04, which I wish it did. Instead, it has Porsche C30, VW 504/507, Mercedes 229.31/229.51/229.52. It's an API SN (wish it was an SN+ or SP for LSPI) and ACEA C2/C3, so, I'm betting it's robust enough to survive 5000 mile OCI's and as long as I have no LSPI events (I don't hear/feel any rumbling at low RPMs), and change it out at 5000 miles, it should provide fine service. If not, I'll be hit with an expensive rebuild!
Thanks, only thing about LSPI that I keep seeing is GENERALLY oils that help combat LSPI have "less Calcium and more Magnesium" than others. That's not enough info to me to be 100% certain it fights LSPI...but, I think one or more of the Mercedes specs addresses LSPI, so, it's probably fine! Sure would be nice to see SN+ or SP on the bottle, but, it doesn't. Nevertheless, I picked up three cases of 6 bottles each at a great deal. Have two more cases remaining. I'll just keep using them then see what's available when it's time to pick something else.Looks very good. Lack of magnesium is partly offset by the huge dose of boron, starts off around 400 ppm IIRC.
It's a modern formula I'd not have any LSPI concerns using it over any other oil.
The spec is 17FE+, Ow20. The owner's manual also lists an alternate of 0w30. This Euro LX doesn't have the BMW LL04, which I wish it did. Instead, it has Porsche C30, VW 504/507, Mercedes 229.31/229.51/229.52. It's an API SN (wish it was an SN+ or SP for LSPI) and ACEA C2/C3, so, I'm betting it's robust enough to survive 5000 mile OCI's and as long as I have no LSPI events (I don't hear/feel any rumbling at low RPMs), and change it out at 5000 miles, it should provide fine service. If not, I'll be hit with an expensive rebuild!
Looks very good. Lack of magnesium is partly offset by the huge dose of boron, starts off around 400 ppm IIRC.
It's a modern formula I'd not have any LSPI concerns using it over any other oil.
I appreciate the comments! In combination with the UOA, I'm becoming less concerned about the lack of LL-04 rating, as well as thoughts on LSPI. (Who doesn't like a bit of confirmational bias?)I agree with that. This oil did an excellent job just like it was a true LL-04. I did use
it in the past.
True, no reason to overthink LSPI. I also agree on boron. This oil is known to be a boron
bomb. Boron uses to start at 400+ ppm, and since it doesn't evaporate I'd say it has to sit
somewhere else now where it likely helped to reduce Fe, Al, Cr and Cu wear.
.
B48. Good to know. Thanks!B46/48: Rare LSPI issues.
BMW is not KIA. Don’t worry too much.
Use MB229.52.B48. Good to know. Thanks!
It has MB229.52 spec. TAN was 2.5 after 5000 miles, when I changed it. Should be a good oil for this application even without LL04.Use MB229.52.
Also, if no LL04, do TAN measurement so you know oxidation is in check.
You have in UOA TBN not TAN.It has MB229.52 spec. TAN was 2.5 after 5000 miles, when I changed it. Should be a good oil for this application even without LL04.
Maybe. I am just saying considering tough BMW requirements on oxidation, to check it. I highly doubt it will be an issue..
Wouldn't copper likely show higher numbers if acidity was an issue?
.
Thanks for pointing out TAN vs TBN. I wasn't paying close enough attention.Maybe. I am just saying considering tough BMW requirements on oxidation, to check it. I highly doubt it will be an issue.
Those B46/48 have some issues around losing coolant.Thanks for pointing out TAN vs TBN. I wasn't paying close enough attention.
Another reason I did this UOA was to check for coolant contamination. I noticed the reservoir level was a bit low a few weeks ago, and decided to bring it up to the Max Cool Level. It took more than I thought it would, and since I couldn't find any external leaks, thought a UOA would be a good idea. It was probably a bit low when I bought the car, but, I must have never checked the reservoir when it was fully cooled...since adding coolant, no loss detected. No contamination noted. Happy all around.
Yep, mine 2018 B46 is loosing coolant from max to low within 4-5 month (main reservoir) . Radiator cap replacement did not helpThose B46/48 have some issues around losing coolant.