If you mean gun-related, at least in Ohio our laws more or less revert to federal law. Ohio doesn't go beyond federal restrictions.
Since only the tax is removed, what follows doesn't apply, but if the "registry" ends up getting removed, many states will need to update their laws. Ohio, for example, says it is "illegal to possess a suppressor unless “registered in the national firearms registration and transfer record...”". 18-20 other US states have similar laws.
Just a minor correction: it’s not annual photographs. It’s one time when you submit the form.
A 22 rimfire can is absolutely worth the price if you like to shoot. With standard velocity ammo the impact on the target is louder than the muzzle blast. It really is almost movie quiet. I can shoot a brick of ammo from my porch and the neighbors never know and the dogs don’t even bark.
+1 +1 +1 +1
You are lucky. There are some states that completely ignore such things. We need lifeline seriously
Totally would Dundee a bush knife if I had one.....
Excellent point........if there is no tax, the NFA has no legs..........we will see how that plays out.
The NFA as first introduced applied the $200 tax to machine guns, handguns and handgun substitutes like sawn off shotguns, rifles, ect . The authors of the bill found out they couldn't get it passed with the tax on handguns included, so they took it out but the other items that had been included, like an after thought, remained.Excellent point........if there is no tax, the NFA has no legs..........we will see how that plays out.
Shorter guns after all, are better of the environment, less material, less weight in transport, smaller boxes, less trees cut down, less carbon footprint......maybe by 5%......way more than the .03% fuel economy increases.....and as @Astro14 put it, a shorter gun with a can is much more handy. Better hearing for all. I wonder what the issue is?
I wouldn't mind a suppressed .22 for quieter plinking
first i heard that
And I’d argue that violent crimes committed with knives or blunt force instruments are actually far more violent in nature.
there is no argument, you are correct
I agree - I expect short term sales will plummet which may lead to that “oversupply” and lowered prices that another poster suggested.
Think we'll see the standard gun industry scare tactics ? "Hey folks, don't delay your NFA purchases because it might get overturned. Buy them now !".
I believe more companies will begin producing them, especially if the registration requirements are eliminated.
I agree, too. Over the past several months, I’ve seen a lot of “sales“, in which various manufacturers and distributors offer “free tax stamp“ as it means to promote sales. These are high profit items on an individual basis, the cost of manufacturing is dramatically lower than the retail price, and it’s been interesting to watch what sales have looked like leading up to this highly anticipated decision.
I'll bet you the big guys in that market can produce these cans for under $100/unit.
I have 14 stamps. One of my cans is 3D printed from Inconel and a couple are fully welded Titanium so I wouldn't say that all cans have 50 bucks of material. I do agree with you that they are priced high but I think limited production is a big part of that.
