quote:
Originally posted by novadude:
Does anyone want to comment on this statement?
quote:
"It's probably risky to recommend … 10W-XX oils below or down to 0 degrees F. It's not clear that the SAE classification protects for these grades down to these temperatures."
http://www.imakenews.com/lng/e_article000335905.cfm?x=b11,0,w
I have been using 10W-30 in PA for many years, and I have seen many cold starts in the 0 deg to 10 deg F range. Have I been doing it wrong all these years?
Personally, I think this comment is bunk. Below 0 deg F, I'd start to worry, but I wonder why they say it is "risky" down to 0 deg F???
I think you misinterpret what is being said. I think the person quoted from GM is complaining about the new API guide.
While acknowledging that the Guide was better than previous versions, "all the symbols still made it confusing," Mike McMillan of General Motors told Lube Report. McMillan chairs ILSAC, the committee representing U.S. and Japanese automobile manufacturers on engine oil issues, and he went on to summarize opinions on the document from other ILSAC members, who declined to be identified.
For example, he said, the Guide makes some technical claims which are of concern. "It's probably risky to recommend … 10W-XX oils below or down to 0 degrees F. It's not clear that the SAE classification protects for these grades down to these temperatures.
"Further, the Guide is incorrect in saying that SB oils are good for engines built before 1964," he pointed out. "Vehicles with hydraulic valve lifters, which were available even in the 1930s, require detergent oils, not SB oils. It was noted that the API website shows a young family in front of a 1955 Chevrolet with the hood up and a bottle of engine oil. [We] certainly hope that it is not a bottle of SB oil.
"On the second page," McMillan continued, "[the Guide] states that SM oils are 'for all automotive engines currently in use.' This is only true for General Motors if the SM oil also happens to be ILSAC GF-4 and carries the Starburst, and is the right viscosity grade. To say SM is good in all automotive engines is misleading at best."
Looking at the guide I would agree. What moron would use the 15W40 CI-4 service grade for an example of how to read the donut, and then not put it in the temperature chart?
The SAE clearly and unambiguously defines the 0w, 5w, 10w, 15w, 20w, 25w grades. And they modified the
J300 Chart several years ago specifically to insure if the engine would crank, the oil will flow, i.e., the MRV viscosity is rated at a 5C degree colder temperature than the CCS viscosity.
About the only good advice I see on their new chart is this line:
"Note that vehicle requirements may vary. Follow your vehicle manufacturer’s recommendations on SAE oil viscosity grade."
In a perfect world, that statement would be suffixed with, "if you don't have a clue about selecting oil".