Hello all you grease monkeys out there.
Ok so ive been using Motul Turbo lite 10w/40 semi-synthetic on my 97 Swift GTI with 128xxxkms for about 1 year with 5000km oil changes. Havnt had any issues and my engine seems to be in great shape.
Anyways after getting a forum members opinion of this oil he said it isn't anything special for the price.
With the release of Castrol's Edge range of synthetic oils my eyes opened to their 0w/40 product. I think these castrol products use a higher base synthetic group than the motul and I love the sound of 0w starting up. It costs 70$ compared to $45 but considering I will be taking the car occasionally to the track and strip as well as my usual combo of spirited street driving better protection (if any) is worth the extra money.
Also being pretty busy these days I don't always have the time to change the oil as I found recently when I hit the 5000km mark. So even slightly extended drain intervals could be of benefit to me to give me the peace of mind the engines still being protected well with the synthetic.
Does anyone have some viscosity charts of these 2 oils so I can tell e.g. if one is a heavy or light 40?
Now some questions.
Firstly in regards to the 0w at startup. I read on a viscosity chart about 0w flowing at -30 cranking. because I dont live in the artic my car will never see such low temperature starts. Possibly at worst 5 degrees on a rare freezing winters morning. Will the 0/w's superior cold flow temperature properties still be an advantage over say the 10w even if the temperature never hits freezing temperatures or that -30 degrees for instance. I.e will it generally flow quicker than the 10w at any given cranking temp?
Can the 0w make starting the car easier when cold?
Secondly like most engines im pretty sure mine uses that system of splashing oil around to help lubricate parts. One member suggested a heavier weight can be better at startup because this flung oil sticks better to parts while another member suggested that a lighter oil will splash further and easier. Does anyone know the correct theory behind oil splashing and its relation to the oils wieght. However considering my recent learning that the first number doesnt relate to weight at all but purely flow perhaps this whole argument is irelevant if thinking in cold startup terms.
Secondly I plan to get an oil cooler installed. From what ive read these can lower oil temps by %10. Can this have a thickening effect on the oil? E.g. essentially causing a 40 weight to become 45? Same deal with electric water pump im going to intall which can decrease engine/coolant temps, perhaps this will thicken my oil a little to? Anything I should know in this regard.
Thirdly I was planning on doing a UOA on both these oils to compare them. There seems to be some critism of UOA in terms of determing a engines condition however a UOA is still useful in comparing the performance of 2 oils right? Or are there too many variables to make an accurate conclusion? I'm guessing im going to get some varied responses to this question. heh.
Thanks for your input and time.
Ok so ive been using Motul Turbo lite 10w/40 semi-synthetic on my 97 Swift GTI with 128xxxkms for about 1 year with 5000km oil changes. Havnt had any issues and my engine seems to be in great shape.
Anyways after getting a forum members opinion of this oil he said it isn't anything special for the price.
With the release of Castrol's Edge range of synthetic oils my eyes opened to their 0w/40 product. I think these castrol products use a higher base synthetic group than the motul and I love the sound of 0w starting up. It costs 70$ compared to $45 but considering I will be taking the car occasionally to the track and strip as well as my usual combo of spirited street driving better protection (if any) is worth the extra money.
Also being pretty busy these days I don't always have the time to change the oil as I found recently when I hit the 5000km mark. So even slightly extended drain intervals could be of benefit to me to give me the peace of mind the engines still being protected well with the synthetic.
Does anyone have some viscosity charts of these 2 oils so I can tell e.g. if one is a heavy or light 40?
Now some questions.
Firstly in regards to the 0w at startup. I read on a viscosity chart about 0w flowing at -30 cranking. because I dont live in the artic my car will never see such low temperature starts. Possibly at worst 5 degrees on a rare freezing winters morning. Will the 0/w's superior cold flow temperature properties still be an advantage over say the 10w even if the temperature never hits freezing temperatures or that -30 degrees for instance. I.e will it generally flow quicker than the 10w at any given cranking temp?
Can the 0w make starting the car easier when cold?
Secondly like most engines im pretty sure mine uses that system of splashing oil around to help lubricate parts. One member suggested a heavier weight can be better at startup because this flung oil sticks better to parts while another member suggested that a lighter oil will splash further and easier. Does anyone know the correct theory behind oil splashing and its relation to the oils wieght. However considering my recent learning that the first number doesnt relate to weight at all but purely flow perhaps this whole argument is irelevant if thinking in cold startup terms.
Secondly I plan to get an oil cooler installed. From what ive read these can lower oil temps by %10. Can this have a thickening effect on the oil? E.g. essentially causing a 40 weight to become 45? Same deal with electric water pump im going to intall which can decrease engine/coolant temps, perhaps this will thicken my oil a little to? Anything I should know in this regard.
Thirdly I was planning on doing a UOA on both these oils to compare them. There seems to be some critism of UOA in terms of determing a engines condition however a UOA is still useful in comparing the performance of 2 oils right? Or are there too many variables to make an accurate conclusion? I'm guessing im going to get some varied responses to this question. heh.
Thanks for your input and time.