Search results

  1. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    I stopped even reading about your beliefs and traditionals and misheard lyrics and stuff. Haven't noticed how I started asking you? Asking you to tell what had been done by your guys. I could find the King company if I were interested but asked for your newer studies or info about the pics you...
  2. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Please steer me towards your newer studies anytime. In the meantime I'll be watching the news https://www.centerforqa.com/ifc-news/
  3. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    JSTOR has the entire Dingens, you know them already: www.jstor.org/stable/44471538 But we're not interested in oil qualities here, we're interested in steering you towards true engine operation. Steer you away from your Sommerfeld Blues wherein you want to deal with the variables as much as you...
  4. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    That's clear, but not actually reading it, it's just a curve and becomes a problem. That's what happens here all the time. A pump characteristic can be a pump characteristic in a curve. Then people who are looking at engine use need to even restore the meanings of curves. A rotating disc may...
  5. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    That exactly as so often is the point, ZeeO, an engine doesn't necessarily keep and hold all other things... Christian came from car engines at 9000rpm on the road before you made it look as if anyone had to be interested in whatever steady loading and stuff to get nothing but whatever...
  6. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Here could be some rod-MOFT the other way round – what now, my love? We know there's loads developing, viscosities heating down and shearing round and round – no sense in looking at just a pic and being done, right? https://books.google.de/books?id=p22PDwAAQBAJ Another (SAE 930694):
  7. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    As I got to know this forum, it cannot be a problem to find a pic that shows these numbers upside down and inside out :) ...so, where's table 7 from, please, or what did they do? Guess I've seen it once, but can't remember.
  8. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Makes it sound as if Stribeck had designed a curve for rod or rotor bearing MOFT over the 9krpm or as if per some other artist's impression the revs had been declared no longer the problem. But there's no Stribeck ruling MOFT, of course. The popular curve's purple lullaby's merely illustrating...
  9. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Moving on https://www.shell.de/geschaefts-und-privatkunden/shell-schmierstoffe-fuer-geschaeftskunden/shell-schmierstoff-produktfamilien/rimula-truck-heavy-duty-engine-oil/shell-rimula-premium-motorenoele.html
  10. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Mazda's latest take on fine tuning the air and the sirup: https://ipforce.jp/patent-jp-A-2021-95939 Reminding of last year's story of the air, the honey and the capillary: https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/when-honey-flows-faster-than-water https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/42/eaba5197
  11. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Find the #50 in a funny list of #40s: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/pao-up-to-70-in-some-lucas-synthetics.333467/post-5587614 To reflect differences in BOV a little better they of course could have run this petrol V6 a little faster than the experiment's 1500rpm ;-) And maybe...
  12. B

    All You Guys That Think OEM Recommended 16 or 20 Weight...

    Christian, with engine parts at idle seeing the shear rate of HTHS' conditions and the 9000rpm-limiters allowing for corresponding headroom – or otherwise – people are quickly running out of standardized and pre-approved language and you rightly start judging for yourself. That's fine. The #50...
  13. B

    2019 Chevrolet 3500HD 6.6 Duramax, Chevron Delo 600 ADF, 3k miles on oil, 5k on motor.

    Grüezi, I'm sorry, I think I didn't actually mean to focus so much on oxidation there (personally I can leave it all to the semi automatically oil changing rotary car and I'm about as interested in the ultra low ash AW-performance as in oxidative stability – so in any case I didn't want to make...
  14. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    Thank you, PimTac! Hadn't thought of the report-button. I shall immediately see what I can do for you by reporting me.
  15. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    Paint me a volcano. Brillant idea! Prime example why every second expression of mine should be googled. I'm mostly relying on people to do more or less exactly that, in case they wanted to follow. In this case not even I had an idea this would potentially work out so great. I merely thought...
  16. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    Not worth it for me, but state of the forum. PD to the people. And greetz.
  17. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    If you ask me: Your only chance would be to go back and start all over. Read both threads from the beginning of the first one – just for fun decidedly ignoring each and every one of your own entries. A small chance that would be. But you're fine, ZeeO! Really. You're not the problem, neither...
  18. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    The 6.2 in 2000: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA382457.pdf With this I'll just leave you to your ping pong. Still no sense in anything here, so I've got better things to spend my unintelligibility on than that where people never want to know. Baba
  19. B

    Thick vs. Thin

    That's what Anti-CAFE and the foreign manual oil services are all about.
Back
Top