Recent content by kebabaluba

UE5 is problematic engine, but quite beautiful though

My mobo is so old that i only have SATA bus for all SSD/HDD`s.

So despite MSI data shown and GPU doing most of the workload, it`s CPU that`s holding whole system back? I know i need newer components by the end of the day, just the percentage of the workload shown by MSI data screen confused me a bit.

I have SSD for Windows OS (LTCS) and second SSD for newer games that require SSD to work. Biggest HDD (3rd) is 4tB one that houses other stuff and older games that don`t need SSD to work. UE5 is is quite ****e but still judging by the MSI values the GPU is the one working hardest. RTX 5060 is at...

I don`t own a X99 dual socket mate...

I had to put the game in "windowed mode" but i think we have something...

Ok i see. There is no "problem" though, i just have much more gpu load contra cpu load playing this game and FPS are bit all over the place...

So i`ve downloaded this program now, should i fire up the game and monitor parameters with this program? What am i looking for?

Does that program show similar values on screen like Afterburner does?

Judging by the screenshot of the game i`ve played, is this a clear sign of GPU bottleneck? The game is Metal Gear Solid 4 Delta, one of the most demanding titles i have on my gaming rig. This game is played on 1080p 144Hz monitor, graphics are set to "High" (Ultra is highest) and the DLSS is set...

That was the plan all along, buying only 3 things: mobo, cpu and ram. Mobo and cpu are not that expensive but RAM chips cost dope money...

Thanks for the feedback and opinions so far. I think maybe i just bite the bullet and buy brand new modern mobo, cpu and ram and just have a decent gaming pc for few years from now on. Not gonna lie, dual cpu did sounded like a good idea but seems like i`m wrong about that one...

Aren`t 32gb of ddr4-2400 sufficient or bandwidth quite low?